From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F06DC433F5 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230501AbiCKIP0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 03:15:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39410 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229561AbiCKIPZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 03:15:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B86351017DD for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id lj8-20020a17090b344800b001bfaa46bca3so7343412pjb.2 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:14:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heitbaum.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vjht4VjT0qP1PrjcnyRToI5pLA60dRVnlKZQmWleY/U=; b=oI4ar1HB51LBrLmbj/wtrBaWW6l4roM7ESsTGMRB9dhN2Hcp29WpYsyZY9rWS9EwxH abeTHaIOijZcALiFhzhJ5F83AIFNnYHMsdRURSoj4fxWQAoGv6uxuLT+ac26072g9mhb s0V8ep9BdbVbe4ESy0g5oO0jF/UarS3a4063M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vjht4VjT0qP1PrjcnyRToI5pLA60dRVnlKZQmWleY/U=; b=mabaW16m/PMxCrdDx1HX/JR+KaIacPuox0WaHmRIDx8h3PRlUiiP2dcqOkaBT+AgFn T3c/q4snk3vUAWT35Zf8tV+aCfbfwYkFnN61/TFuzbrWtCrhiNStOuOHix3NQC+7tKRA SJu39suhxxM4o6m3qbSmwv6Y0ZZssLHALZ7VcQ0jP0zp34HCTVP9DfAtnSfEHtAhS2Xe Sgwzyp78G2mO+SwCFQEYvfV+FX3SHTW1wQy1UxhQh048iuxkzPjrgTXCDbhKD+UMGoj4 nlki4MTbxrzqZUd73VpGPno9FGu5qLoEOXN1bAs7QS9hUHUh04WSSvzD/oizPaVinWQT NFcA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KlC+YW/SjlQ56EaenMxkEhyPmugjpL88osQSEUw9r6nAt+r8G mJaGWfv/NetA9vJIoZGSULKx1w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/saDmNql9Jq1CQ7il2FyVSQ7Bh16oUvFbLTU8pS5XMo0dn0zdMXb1+6ruIfhTQsBNccvZGA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e2cc:b0:1bf:711f:11e7 with SMTP id fr12-20020a17090ae2cc00b001bf711f11e7mr20407339pjb.40.1646986461176; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from 5fcf59323384 ([203.221.136.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5-20020a056a00248500b004f6b5ddcc65sm9862257pfv.199.2022.03.11.00.14.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:14:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:14:11 +0000 From: Rudi Heitbaum To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 00/53] 5.16.14-rc2 review Message-ID: <20220311081411.GA7@5fcf59323384> References: <20220310140811.832630727@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220310140811.832630727@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 03:09:05PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Note, I'm sending all the patches again for all of the -rc2 releases as > there has been a lot of churn from what was in -rc1 to -rc2. > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.14 release. > There are 53 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. Hi Greg, 5.16.14-rc2 tested. Run tested on: - Allwinner H6 (Tanix TX6) - Intel Tiger Lake x86_64 (nuc11 i7-1165G7) In addition - build tested on: - Allwinner A64 - Allwinner H3 - Allwinner H5 - NXP iMX6 - NXP iMX8 - Qualcomm Dragonboard - Rockchip RK3288 - Rockchip RK3328 - Rockchip RK3399pro - Samsung Exynos Tested-by: Rudi Heitbaum -- Rudi