stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm: Take a page reference when removing device exclusive entries
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:25:19 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230330012519.804116-1-apopple@nvidia.com> (raw)

Device exclusive page table entries are used to prevent CPU access to
a page whilst it is being accessed from a device. Typically this is
used to implement atomic operations when the underlying bus does not
support atomic access. When a CPU thread encounters a device exclusive
entry it locks the page and restores the original entry after calling
mmu notifiers to signal drivers that exclusive access is no longer
available.

The device exclusive entry holds a reference to the page making it
safe to access the struct page whilst the entry is present. However
the fault handling code does not hold the PTL when taking the page
lock. This means if there are multiple threads faulting concurrently
on the device exclusive entry one will remove the entry whilst others
will wait on the page lock without holding a reference.

This can lead to threads locking or waiting on a folio with a zero
refcount. Whilst mmap_lock prevents the pages getting freed via
munmap() they may still be freed by a migration. This leads to
warnings such as PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE due to the page being locked
when the refcount drops to zero.

Fix this by trying to take a reference on the folio before locking
it. The code already checks the PTE under the PTL and aborts if the
entry is no longer there. It is also possible the folio has been
unmapped, freed and re-allocated allowing a reference to be taken on
an unrelated folio. This case is also detected by the PTE check and
the folio is unlocked without further changes.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Fixes: b756a3b5e7ea ("mm: device exclusive memory access")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

---

Changes for v2:

 - Rebased to Linus master
 - Reworded commit message
 - Switched to using folios (thanks Matthew!)
 - Added Reviewed-by's
---
 mm/memory.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index f456f3b5049c..01a23ad48a04 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3563,8 +3563,21 @@ static vm_fault_t remove_device_exclusive_entry(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
 	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
 
-	if (!folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vma->vm_mm, vmf->flags))
+	/*
+	 * We need a reference to lock the folio because we don't hold
+	 * the PTL so a racing thread can remove the device-exclusive
+	 * entry and unmap it. If the folio is free the entry must
+	 * have been removed already. If it happens to have already
+	 * been re-allocated after being freed all we do is lock and
+	 * unlock it.
+	 */
+	if (!folio_try_get(folio))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vma->vm_mm, vmf->flags)) {
+		folio_put(folio);
 		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
+	}
 	mmu_notifier_range_init_owner(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_EXCLUSIVE, 0,
 				vma->vm_mm, vmf->address & PAGE_MASK,
 				(vmf->address & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
@@ -3577,6 +3590,7 @@ static vm_fault_t remove_device_exclusive_entry(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 
 	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
 	folio_unlock(folio);
+	folio_put(folio);
 
 	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.39.2


             reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-30  1:25 Alistair Popple [this message]
2023-03-30  1:44 ` [PATCH v2] mm: Take a page reference when removing device exclusive entries John Hubbard
2023-03-30  2:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-30  3:11   ` Alistair Popple
2023-04-03 12:02 ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230330012519.804116-1-apopple@nvidia.com \
    --to=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).