From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A821C433F5 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D8D60FC2 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231484AbhKDP4i (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:56:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34728 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229770AbhKDP4h (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:56:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x332.google.com (mail-ot1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::332]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA701C061714 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x332.google.com with SMTP id w29-20020a056830411d00b0055abaca9349so8805731ott.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 08:53:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=57ktjFEtesdLi+1z8hbOyPWZtwGeamLgAiEVc1UH7SI=; b=hvQniKKj9i6+dl6JNccGuh2PvpCpsDuoVFrCnvGilJu8SYU9eBOcuD9lh3Cc7Y6KTD 0CQ89U+sfMehs2LPTWE813UzweLDzS1N2iXmIhbUYDpJt8jfXfNWYgIVSAV18vlHJnLb C8exfXMDAylDbwllx/DaHJm+2nRmxmzXza6jZXXUQyfKotZKv3Gswmux2bRp4THBka11 d98qdzU4mkZPVpX+UhV/1za5+VBkiRqn2iTAXt4RsfTOTNwwQapGlOzt2sS7HCSuBEUJ brZK4nM/ijzoFclXVD28MfaPqRR32WrQHLHxKGFbnX6XMIHhyYkaFI8zzdpcuGSlBzdl 0Vfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=57ktjFEtesdLi+1z8hbOyPWZtwGeamLgAiEVc1UH7SI=; b=SfOrmx/I2r4L5eupAmx6xa5EIBQzaKYhfgD4B9RzF5fgR7Xdh7IAHYcWkwWVxWOfTI nLwy02xiGDH2PK2ZE6oc7E6o7qzhgWJQYn/kuAqNYprabGbtOSBPJXAHhnFAzOzoAOuh dKfUKC+jGQDBPHRTtInOFWsbplRKfE/KGN7wwDuFUPQ7vhvGZCv/Zq7UeUQcJ0PmML3m jO4MazqoeRouESCV/Fq/mArp1+6bDjVO99CPx5soyvF47FNTN71M7oiot3EqZkQyZ8CU 13YjFmjfpkTV5/et+5Fbyh76d2xV9H4eZiaOrdtPG4trySL+pX54vhXp1uEm+LVVx+O1 650w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532mhbq50/G6ZvyWgD26+t/2c9ZfNAqbg9Z55MFUZr7dyvmn35Uu p937Rt0Gc3gP6Gt0ie7RnZwU4w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNEREUFoRziBuC9TC46+Lk+CuVVn9ESUk41WEdsVUDos1AKVw2RANG141JlLfGmQJPM14Aag== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:22ef:: with SMTP id t15mr37489047otc.368.1636041238980; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 08:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.17.16] ([189.219.75.83]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x8sm1471617otg.31.2021.11.04.08.53.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Nov 2021 08:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/16] 5.10.78-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: shuah@kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, pavel@denx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net References: <20211104141159.561284732@linuxfoundation.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_D=c3=adaz?= Message-ID: <3971a9b4-ebb6-a789-2143-31cf257d0d38@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:53:57 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211104141159.561284732@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hello! On 11/4/21 8:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.78 release. > There are 16 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sat, 06 Nov 2021 14:11:51 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.78-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Regressions detected. Build failures on all architectures and all toolchains (GCC 8, 9, 10, 11; Clang 10, 11, 12, 13, nightly): - arc - arm (32-bits) - arm (64-bits) - i386 - mips - parisc - ppc - riscv - s390 - sh - sparc - x86 Failures look like this: In file included from /builds/linux/include/linux/kernel.h:11, from /builds/linux/include/linux/list.h:9, from /builds/linux/include/linux/smp.h:12, from /builds/linux/include/linux/kernel_stat.h:5, from /builds/linux/mm/memory.c:42: /builds/linux/mm/memory.c: In function 'finish_fault': /builds/linux/mm/memory.c:3929:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'PageHasHWPoisoned'; did you mean 'PageHWPoison'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 3929 | if (unlikely(PageHasHWPoisoned(page))) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /builds/linux/include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely' 78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) | ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors and this: /builds/linux/mm/memory.c:3929:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'PageHasHWPoisoned' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] if (unlikely(PageHasHWPoisoned(page))) ^ /builds/linux/mm/page_alloc.c:1237:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'ClearPageHasHWPoisoned' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ClearPageHasHWPoisoned(page); ^ /builds/linux/mm/page_alloc.c:1237:4: note: did you mean 'ClearPageHWPoison'? Greetings! Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org