From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFCAC282DD for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0242175B for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730751AbfEWOgJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2019 10:36:09 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:51943 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730710AbfEWOgJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2019 10:36:09 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com ([209.85.222.200]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1hTomd-0004c9-Oe for stable@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 23 May 2019 14:33:27 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id l16so5599076qkk.9 for ; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:33:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+W0ZBRDPuAaLAeSp2LgbinBlDum/QNL/K+lovUbkcD4=; b=PnrnL5W2g5hNqoylXrIpuUh9cIgE2j8xNr3wL0FU+mNnR5KoPTI0/rbUMivXjhKvih ZM/nbi6yJjS7E3BdMQTor9M0L2NepCFcn/LWvokMO6sBouFIvCd8lPgXCgFVBX9GHcM/ oT8hfVb5CFQt/tk3Y9kxEK9Iz3VVBfkrzV9iWRQWEspVhRdtIlYK5r4oELZWAOhjOIHx 3jJ4aZZxeX6BAWLxToWYuIVn2fXvJBG89msKu6Nyfrcr0CLaAdV3q6CyzM7Epv0Faprh 1Lx+m/YymLWucD+EGVv+jkt8oosCARZKGES4nbi5umPeIfoNpNliUSNzhsvwfnBGnUh1 eP2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX4kxz1nghmqogZJX6NoSnyTzqluaOYIp+6TyEukibz08pjazXX 6vbHBF79EoGoVOIlTunAOrM5+d1Dt7QMO2F7SteAf0u97O9mNihsbRNNnbQ/oORSg9HGUQ9ELWk GQDG/XXeodGQWdnj/VcyU9eUm72xLRkH3ow== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:158d:: with SMTP id d13mr16893977qkk.271.1558622007015; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:33:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4fx9yFrXtTha0kc9WnfvL/SpBlMkzsC3W/wxnbxEkRyUOM5BUYVF5f7rIG11P0f6vMljE7g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:158d:: with SMTP id d13mr16893950qkk.271.1558622006798; Thu, 23 May 2019 07:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.205] (189-47-79-212.dsl.telesp.net.br. [189.47.79.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m8sm17911949qta.10.2019.05.23.07.33.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 May 2019 07:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] block: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in generic_make_request() To: Song Liu Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid , dm-devel@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, Gavin Guo , Jay Vosburgh , "Guilherme G. Piccoli" , stable@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche , Ming Lei , Eric Ren , hch@infradead.org References: <20190520220911.25192-1-gpiccoli@canonical.com> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Message-ID: <3e583b2d-742a-3238-69ed-7a2e6cce417b@canonical.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 11:33:21 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On 21/05/2019 02:59, Song Liu wrote: > > Applied both patches! Thanks for the fix! Hi Song, sorry for the annoyance, but the situation of both patches is a bit confused for me heheh You mention you've applied both patches - I couldn't find your tree. Also, Christoph noticed Ming's series fixes both issues and suggested to drop both my patches in favor of Ming's clean-up, or at least make them -stable only. So, what is the current status of the patches? Can we have them on -stable trees at least? If so, how should I proceed? Thanks in advance for the clarification! Cheers, Guilherme