* Re: [PATCH] nfsd: fix race between cache_clean and cache_purge
[not found] <5eed50660eb13326b0fbf537fb58481ea53c1acb.1585043174.git.wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com>
@ 2020-03-25 1:01 ` Sasha Levin
2020-03-25 14:13 ` Chuck Lever
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2020-03-25 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin, Yihao Wu, J . Bruce Fields; +Cc: linux-nfs, stable
Hi
[This is an automated email]
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.11, v5.4.27, v4.19.112, v4.14.174, v4.9.217, v4.4.217.
v5.5.11: Build OK!
v5.4.27: Build OK!
v4.19.112: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock")
v4.14.174: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock")
v4.9.217: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock")
2b477c00f3bd ("svcrpc: free contexts immediately on PROC_DESTROY")
471a930ad7d1 ("SUNRPC: Drop all entries from cache_detail when cache_purge()")
v4.4.217: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock")
2b477c00f3bd ("svcrpc: free contexts immediately on PROC_DESTROY")
471a930ad7d1 ("SUNRPC: Drop all entries from cache_detail when cache_purge()")
d8d29138b17c ("sunrpc: remove 'inuse' flag from struct cache_detail.")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nfsd: fix race between cache_clean and cache_purge
2020-03-25 1:01 ` [PATCH] nfsd: fix race between cache_clean and cache_purge Sasha Levin
@ 2020-03-25 14:13 ` Chuck Lever
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Lever @ 2020-03-25 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Levin; +Cc: Yihao Wu, Bruce Fields, Linux NFS Mailing List, stable
> On Mar 24, 2020, at 9:01 PM, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.11, v5.4.27, v4.19.112, v4.14.174, v4.9.217, v4.4.217.
>
> v5.5.11: Build OK!
> v5.4.27: Build OK!
> v4.19.112: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock")
>
> v4.14.174: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock")
>
> v4.9.217: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock")
> 2b477c00f3bd ("svcrpc: free contexts immediately on PROC_DESTROY")
> 471a930ad7d1 ("SUNRPC: Drop all entries from cache_detail when cache_purge()")
>
> v4.4.217: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 1863d77f15da ("SUNRPC: Replace the cache_detail->hash_lock with a regular spinlock")
> 2b477c00f3bd ("svcrpc: free contexts immediately on PROC_DESTROY")
> 471a930ad7d1 ("SUNRPC: Drop all entries from cache_detail when cache_purge()")
> d8d29138b17c ("sunrpc: remove 'inuse' flag from struct cache_detail.")
>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
Please drop it. Thanks!
--
Chuck Lever
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-25 14:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <5eed50660eb13326b0fbf537fb58481ea53c1acb.1585043174.git.wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com>
2020-03-25 1:01 ` [PATCH] nfsd: fix race between cache_clean and cache_purge Sasha Levin
2020-03-25 14:13 ` Chuck Lever
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).