From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E9FC31E44 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 23:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592A021734 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 23:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="awiuQUI9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390488AbfFKXrL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 19:47:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:39406 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387864AbfFKXrK (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 19:47:10 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id j2so8427359pfe.6; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:47:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=0w5PyTbJcE+7PtxzV1JAmmnhaz4mbqsIEXxhrO8y/nc=; b=awiuQUI9gAtnyBWDyPM2oiviNP96T4I/xvCOoYN8SvRkrI3hkL7yO40eUmXFWK9NXe n25uEimbmgQMRIUwQDsK7uB9FzGqunzfIyhc9Jpja6faHqQNVtUUILNUmMz4VmvWRbcU 88M/QCEJG6n31wDtCi6remU5Gm015Z5iHY4lep5y2jXRhNQ2tHjYYf2RrT1Izv7cW7lD zCjccDTXUo6rX3ThwVJzKbu5GhA9LE0PSUSLx7oW5AjqKRJTWrE3hXGOFuRkD/Sxa8Yy a/sgSvbiRJU6W7/jOIq9kmxRuHZKgbQvDGHDqPeGBnYxPp1FDtXz8gSEjgLvy1OQygxU 7K9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=0w5PyTbJcE+7PtxzV1JAmmnhaz4mbqsIEXxhrO8y/nc=; b=ojhq0ImAOWHYNHMvv2yf4vIPSM3yGybHm25YLgg5PEDqV3HWW5t92V7kqInaM9AFPU IFseO40qHFu1PfAsOBpZq1cTis8vZaEsHPdcmCl2yxPQ/gQsFBHVcLGCr/Z6A0OCX2o+ PrydeHt1QmwPxLxRiEO0LRyhIFENo54ZEoItKRFtPbp+/WpoEpuGuG9D9P4iWxDi6CfW FlmVV5jIO7oVldSc9RvRg/eaxM/X9KnFG/Z1cuLV+lsBe2KfDX7waq+yi2vqEbbHL1mM mwLPWmKNPcDlgbDu7OFBBeAUZJZ+0oBgTXAF6Fd45m+VTwZ36evFxBWThLa+Q79hk+SE GQ4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVHGqmsT5bcbtbjUdEY96D3jXhzzoyIrc7JXYwtGigaIGDPCkYH 1QsmuB/ULpzu75l6YDpFH78AD4Ds X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzeIvJOr5WW9SHcd0aMEUsnXezqVeQDxfD8PoMhsBB0v0thKDyGBWGxNbX7Bc3gVOUf0GtrAg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:2e46:: with SMTP id u67mr82884329pfu.206.1560296830006; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:200c:cd5b:7c57:228c:7f0a? ([2001:df0:0:200c:cd5b:7c57:228c:7f0a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e4sm21818015pgi.80.2019.06.11.16.47.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] scsi: NCR5380: Always re-enable reselection interrupt To: Finn Thain Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <61f0c0f6aaf8fa96bf3dade5475615b2cfbc8846.1560043151.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.au> <58081aba-4e77-3c8e-847e-0698cf80e426@gmail.com> From: Michael Schmitz Message-ID: <9c61076b-81f7-dc7b-0103-1e2e56072453@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 11:46:59 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Finn, On 11/06/19 9:33 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Michael Schmitz wrote: > >> Hi Finn, >> >> IIRC I'd tested that change as well - didn't change broken target >> behaviour but no regressions in other respects. Add my tested-by if >> needed. >> > Unfortunately I can't confirm that this is the same patch as the one you > tested as I no longer have that commit. But Stan did test a wide variety > of targets and I'm confident that the reselection code path was covered. > No matter - patch applied cleanly to what I'm running on my Falcon, and works just fine for now (stresstest will take a few hours to complete). And that'll thoroughly exercise the reselection code path, from what we've seen before. Cheers,     Michael