From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDC3C38A2A for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93072496D for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="x3ecS+EQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727892AbgEHNXM (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 09:23:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37538 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728692AbgEHNXJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 09:23:09 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x144.google.com (mail-lf1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::144]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F50BC05BD43 for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 06:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x144.google.com with SMTP id 188so1388058lfa.10 for ; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:23:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VIU8yowc2+V8zkMLN+ep9zXZ58SIv77iw9jZ8rjfvrk=; b=x3ecS+EQSfs1Ivb0Effx7BC2qW6VK0RgGMyWkN1KysgXKJJbbnrP6SCO676GhKEZXO sQ2oKgxBAaIRXNXRQLhVMuIm29qEEWtreP+iEkGP2GeNXiUdIuvC+7uPZ85x30069/X2 RYMzh8SJswH6UReBKcCMznaKe+WTJOTW5301kpAXHJY7WRTVzyPaBSAZddYyxfmJxIoH pXnDZnh/LYb6SI2Q58x2RR3wu/CW5o1owKOY90kIo0i1+pkidceCzyGJqy1XUGFFCm1I SL1mc4h1Wq++a4PyfFFyJx5RsB9dngGKjb9OCOKoF3wOsOQUugj7/nWq25pzW73UWCZb tfmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VIU8yowc2+V8zkMLN+ep9zXZ58SIv77iw9jZ8rjfvrk=; b=jhDqfJtb+C+H9XGKOMhLPBhYoOU+rVrTOz3jRSeTbQnQ9ybYjRyKxj4UtG4Ts8Hirx dQ2Ug8VcndMdbqZ8P9pILHu+4N0YKhadjJLCVDcI4puoRg26vsB/EpYyCc+0RUy1cotw R2xEyeEbuKN0ady3PdseL4hyLJRzSNSshQvsf6vNi01kxISOZH4+qs0QNVMDYcc4qZUK cZwNQcxdFCsuxknB+jVNj7uu7msJQ8QFwOVYLdP1W8oNAl/W6w3fxMCg/xoLiHR5lZMG 4VcZSMdmQNW5NpARQldX5LU0mFTAUjAhwmpHeqRDVl52++r8pFqwrJIRqnNw/Zjs3Fsq fIDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531zGXGz/fUEzSKDWJoP8nwZbJ3onPpjHJmKm+JqKQHsiwPWLvqJ uRo77x0cNarHmwZkpu9nBN+ZyCb9EVHxTzvlY3ILUg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEJjpe16vQv80zYgMKsgsrfGZYRUbLuquVKFzrdtEbGoQTZmrtg7HMWaXV6M+SBfvOeIZlVvloc8btzEbocvY= X-Received: by 2002:a19:3817:: with SMTP id f23mr1863933lfa.6.1588944187717; Fri, 08 May 2020 06:23:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200508123043.085296641@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200508123043.085296641@linuxfoundation.org> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 18:52:56 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/50] 5.4.40-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christoph Hellwig Cc: open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 18:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.40 release. > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 10 May 2020 12:29:44 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-= 5.4.40-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable= -rc.git linux-5.4.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Christoph Hellwig > dma-direct: exclude dma_direct_map_resource from the min_low_pfn chec= k While building kernel Image for arm architecture the following error notice= d on stable-rc 5.4 kernel branch. # make -sk KBUILD_BUILD_USER=3DTuxBuild -C/linux -j16 ARCH=3Darm CROSS_COMPILE=3Darm-linux-gnueabihf- HOSTCC=3Dgcc CC=3D"sccache arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" O=3Dbuild zImage # ../kernel/dma/direct.c: In function =E2=80=98dma_direct_possible=E2=80=99: ../kernel/dma/direct.c:330:3: error: too many arguments to function =E2=80=98dma_capable=E2=80=99 330 | dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../include/linux/dma-direct.h:12, from ../kernel/dma/direct.c:10: ../arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h:17:20: note: declared here 17 | static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from ../include/linux/init.h:5, from ../include/linux/memblock.h:12, from ../kernel/dma/direct.c:7: ../kernel/dma/direct.c: In function =E2=80=98dma_direct_map_resource=E2=80= =99: ../kernel/dma/direct.c:379:16: error: too many arguments to function =E2=80=98dma_capable=E2=80=99 379 | if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, false))) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro =E2=80=98u= nlikely=E2=80=99 78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) | ^ In file included from ../include/linux/dma-direct.h:12, from ../kernel/dma/direct.c:10: ../arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h:17:20: note: declared here 17 | static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ make[3]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:266: kernel/dma/direct.o] Error 1 In file included from ../include/linux/string.h:6, from ../include/linux/dma-mapping.h:6, from ../include/linux/dma-direct.h:5, from ../kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:24: ../kernel/dma/swiotlb.c: In function =E2=80=98swiotlb_map=E2=80=99: ../kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:681:16: error: too many arguments to function =E2=80=98dma_capable=E2=80=99 681 | if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, *dma_addr, size, true))) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro =E2=80=98u= nlikely=E2=80=99 78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) | ^ In file included from ../include/linux/dma-direct.h:12, from ../kernel/dma/swiotlb.c:24: ../arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h:17:20: note: declared here 17 | static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ Full build log, https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/kernel-runs/-/jobs/544288767 --=20 Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org