stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, "dbueso@suse.de" <dbueso@suse.de>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
	Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
	Omar Kilani <omar.kilani@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 13:47:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABeXuvouBzZuNarmNcd9JgZgvonL1N_p21gat=O_x0-1hMx=6A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190527150409.GA8961@redhat.com>

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 8:04 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Deepa,
>
> it seems that we both are saying the same things again and again, and we
> simply can't understand each other.

Oleg, I'm sorry for the confusion.  Maybe I should point out what I
agree with also.

I agree that signal handller being called and return value not being
altered is an issue with other syscalls also. I was just wondering if
some userspace code assumption would be assuming this. This is not a
kernel bug.

But, I do not think we have an understanding of what was wrong in
854a6ed56839a anymore since you pointed out that my assumption was not
correct that the signal handler being called without errno being set
is wrong.

One open question: this part of epoll_pwait was already broken before
854a6ed56839a. Do you agree?

if (err == -EINTR) {
                   memcpy(&current->saved_sigmask, &sigsaved,
                          sizeof(sigsaved));
                    set_restore_sigmask();
  } else
                   set_current_blocked(&sigsaved);

What to do next?
We could just see if your optimization patch resolves Eric's issue.
Or, I could revert the signal_pending() check and provide a fix
something like below(not a complete patch) since mainline has this
regression. Eric had tested something like this works also. And, I can
continue to look at what was wrong with 854a6ed56839a in the first
place. Let me know what you prefer:

-void restore_user_sigmask(const void __user *usigmask, sigset_t *sigsaved)
+int restore_user_sigmask(const void __user *usigmask, sigset_t
*sigsaved, int sig_pending)
 {

        if (!usigmask)
               return;

        /*
         * When signals are pending, do not restore them here.
         * Restoring sigmask here can lead to delivering signals that the above
         * syscalls are intended to block because of the sigmask passed in.
         */
+       if (sig_pending) {
                current->saved_sigmask = *sigsaved;
                set_restore_sigmask();
               return;
           }

@@ -2330,7 +2330,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct
epoll_event __user *, events,

        error = do_epoll_wait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);

-       restore_user_sigmask(sigmask, &sigsaved);
+       signal_detected = restore_user_sigmask(sigmask, &sigsaved,
error == -EINTR);

-Deepa

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-28 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22  3:21 [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask() Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-22 15:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 15:55   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-22 16:14     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 16:33       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23  9:03         ` David Laight
2019-05-23 14:59           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:18             ` David Laight
2019-05-23 16:36               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-23 16:56                 ` David Laight
2019-05-23 18:06                   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23 20:41                     ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-23 21:06                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24  9:58                     ` David Laight
2019-05-24 14:10                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 15:16                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24 16:33                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 17:01                           ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-27 15:04                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-28 20:47                               ` Deepa Dinamani [this message]
2019-05-29 16:57                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 18:42                                   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-28  9:02                             ` David Laight
2019-05-28  9:12                             ` David Laight
2019-05-28 11:37                               ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-28 12:04                                 ` David Laight
2019-05-24 14:19                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 14:29                       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-24 14:51                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 13:29                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 14:59                     ` David Laight
2019-05-24 15:09                       ` David Laight
2019-05-24 15:46                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 15:44                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-24 16:40                         ` David Laight
2019-05-23 14:33         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-22 22:18 ` Chris Down
2019-05-22 22:52   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 16:11 ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-29 16:54   ` David Laight
2019-05-29 18:50     ` Eric Wong
2019-05-30  9:34       ` David Laight
2019-05-30 13:04       ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-29 16:56   ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 18:26   ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-29 22:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30  1:54     ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 18:28       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30 14:40     ` pselect/etc semantics (Was: [PATCH v2] signal: Adjust error codes according to restore_user_sigmask()) Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 18:37       ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-30 13:01   ` pselect/etc semantics Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 15:18     ` David Laight
2019-05-30 16:13       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 15:38     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 15:48       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-30 16:59         ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-05-30 16:08       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 17:20         ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-05-30 16:22       ` David Laight
2019-05-30 15:57     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-30 21:03     ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 13:41   ` [PATCH] signal: remove the wrong signal_pending() check in restore_user_sigmask() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-04 15:31     ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-04 15:57       ` David Laight
2019-06-04 16:37     ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-06-04 18:14       ` Deepa Dinamani
2019-06-04 18:35     ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 21:26     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-04 22:24       ` Eric Wong
2019-06-04 23:51       ` Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-05  9:04         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  8:56       ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  9:02       ` David Laight
2019-06-05  9:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05  9:58           ` David Laight
2019-06-05 15:58     ` [PATCH -mm 0/1] signal: simplify set_user_sigmask/restore_user_sigmask Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-05 15:58       ` [PATCH -mm 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06  0:14         ` kbuild test robot
2019-06-06  1:06         ` kbuild test robot
2019-06-06  7:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06  7:30           ` Sedat Dilek
2019-06-05 17:24       ` [PATCH -mm 0/1] " Linus Torvalds
2019-06-06  9:05         ` David Laight
2019-06-06 11:05           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 11:29             ` David Laight
2019-06-06 12:41               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 13:23                 ` David Laight
2019-06-06 10:22         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 11:32       ` [PATCH -mm V2 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 14:08     ` [PATCH 0/2] select: simplify the usage of restore_saved_sigmask_unless() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-06 14:08       ` [PATCH 1/2] select: change do_poll() to return -ERESTARTNOHAND rather than -EINTR Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-07 18:05         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-06 14:09       ` [PATCH 2/2] select: shift restore_saved_sigmask_unless() into poll_select_copy_remaining() Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-07 21:39       ` [RFC PATCH 0/5]: Removing saved_sigmask Eric W. Biederman
2019-06-11 18:58         ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABeXuvouBzZuNarmNcd9JgZgvonL1N_p21gat=O_x0-1hMx=6A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=omar.kilani@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).