From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7B5C4332F for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 14:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229494AbiJDOHy (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:07:54 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47932 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229469AbiJDOHx (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:07:53 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f178.google.com (mail-qt1-f178.google.com [209.85.160.178]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40EA15F9A4; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-f178.google.com with SMTP id e20so8031612qts.1; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 07:07:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=CwtCVo4E0uHMxh/oXIFSsuUlrvJUZN6evy9/L7XgMRM=; b=ttKKC7oHwP8uhQwfkxVW6CYBu0fscWmPa4jbF4aHqFzvAh/tonDvyuV6wQaDGq8GNB ekrd+8S0dHqiQiFjk/QvD6uR52L+VO52U4DUhNuwqecsNV4kEK7NnNdwrKiTzsOmKGAC 5ql91aYaIZJLKkAf+9X3pj8twN2KzVTqmIGz95qBX0S7sM9y1zAgc66kyRyOpXGVG0/3 LyRTnHNQbBw1OeLfgHP8cYSIgYczS49E0ZK6Z6lWF9aUTMB/ok6dfLIayeKZ1LR3mdlt XLN9XVCCH17NuN25tcoOSG/6QU6EImCpMNdRfUANbTfvQAMy3uozfixoH/WGaTtdayOr WFCg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2iEHo/SL8lYIbEwsq3/BHqr/bVDiFNvWZjvxu0qSUIomWBNZuP VnbtcXTABgp2OGSG2lLiBrKskInogqAu1beoYjg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7XjpNPG7D4U+SwcBGLfHr5S0WNoNxy/EiVr4rwQ/ujw60PsGjVRTB6XGOAzzIOsRR02GBL/zCEsTGnnD05Jao= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a08:b0:35c:d9b5:144b with SMTP id f8-20020a05622a1a0800b0035cd9b5144bmr19566667qtb.27.1664892469614; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 07:07:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220916050535.26625-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> <20220924074953.83064-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> <79cb9aee-9ad5-00f4-3f7a-9c409f502685@linux.alibaba.com> <0f23cee8-9139-742c-a9d1-01674b16d05c@linux.alibaba.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 16:07:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI: APEI: do not add task_work to kernel thread to avoid memory leak To: "Luck, Tony" , Shuai Xue Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , James Morse , "baicar@os.amperecomputing.com" , Len Brown , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Jarkko Sakkinen , =?UTF-8?B?SE9SSUdVQ0hJIE5BT1lBKOWggOWPoyDnm7TkuZ8p?= , "linmiaohe@huawei.com" , Andrew Morton , Stable , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com" , "baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com" , "zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 5:52 PM Luck, Tony wrote: > > > Yes, the error is actually handled in workqueue. I think the point is that the > > synchronous exception signaled by synchronous external abort must be handled > > synchronously, otherwise, it will be signaled again. > > Ok. Got it now. Thanks. > > For Rafael: > > Reviewed-by: Tony Luck Applied as 6.1-rc material, thanks!