From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D2AC433FE for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 13:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233407AbiCIN6k (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:58:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54522 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233375AbiCIN6i (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:58:38 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-f169.google.com (mail-yw1-f169.google.com [209.85.128.169]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0966225C60; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 05:57:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yw1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-2db569555d6so23294647b3.12; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 05:57:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AojWMK2oif5MAyExBuztUEGgT5CpCBKkNqML2H53coE=; b=sCwdIhpSeg4AnnL214Id6GNkvdctQMg8DH11hp5m3beA89LDKmmGUluzpx58KFYIMV PT6OLX1MNTtCLFPTqM4VGmOxOtLB1a/OIifG2hzXUUT1aEzCqVA31sRvxOUvKx/dp7dK KyDhTWwllKdP79RZOBuoZ+uT+O+eOFqbjcXQU6SlfHIk+0Zo/nLjkHOFsTNPb56A7wxg bWjxIEygkIFye9dvznwdtKKG8Z6UzH6OaxEiDvSw8WW1VKaHOpbW9ZPj0Jl/cGNtsOct drPkI8ZKqJD72CMLO62i0u6F/nikrJ/MtwFVZH5y2lpnlKnLL5jRSligOBmFVTgGIeDh oeLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531AK8IhK2qhEQvsID36+bWwhXXOjcebJxtIHqfhFtKOdHFaE9rH SefFW5k3oTVofmjV/bTmD8S4Gpf+87EltcioMK8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7n3OjUBNLgTmstG3Xov+8NR0eRBe5znJEKbdWmv3iwTWKDLTnWT4gc3IAWOQ9IUlaDC1ZETidp/v/7aE69/I= X-Received: by 2002:a81:bd0:0:b0:2dc:184b:e936 with SMTP id 199-20020a810bd0000000b002dc184be936mr17044684ywl.7.1646834255177; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 05:57:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <31b9d1cd-6a67-218b-4ada-12f72e6f00dc@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <31b9d1cd-6a67-218b-4ada-12f72e6f00dc@redhat.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:57:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Many reports of laptops getting hot while suspended with kernels >= 5.16.10 || >= 5.17-rc1 To: Hans de Goede Cc: Linux PM , Stable , Justin Forbes , Mark Pearson , ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:44 PM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > We (Fedora) have been receiving a whole bunch of bug reports about > laptops getting hot/toasty while suspended with kernels >= 5.16.10 > and this seems to still happen with 5.17-rc7 too. > > The following are all bugzilla.redhat.com bug numbers: > > 1750910 - Laptop failed to suspend and completely drained the battery > 2050036 - Framework laptop: 5.16.5 breaks s2idle sleep > 2053957 - Package c-states never go below C2 > 2056729 - No lid events when closing lid / laptop does not suspend > 2057909 - Thinkpad X1C 9th in s2idle suspend still draining battery to zero over night , Ap > 2059668 - HP Envy Laptop deadlocks on entering suspend power state when plugged in. Case ge > 2059688 - Dell G15 5510 s2idle fails in 5.16.11 works in 5.16.10 > > And one of the bugs has also been mirrored at bugzilla.kernel.org by > the reporter: > > bko215641 - Dell G15 5510 s2idle fails in 5.16.11 works in 5.16.10 > > The common denominator here (besides the kernel version) seems to > be that these are all Ice or Tiger Lake systems (I did not do > check this applies 100% to all bugs, but it does see, to be a pattern). > > A similar arch-linux report: > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=274292&p=2 > > Suggest that reverting > "ACPI: PM: s2idle: Cancel wakeup before dispatching EC GPE" > > which was cherry-picked into 5.16.10 fixes things. Thanks for letting me know! > If you want I can create Fedora kernel test-rpms of a recent > 5.16.y with just that one commit reverted and ask users to > confirm if that helps. Please let me know if doing that woulkd > be useful ? Yes, it would. However, it follows from the arch-linux report linked above that 5.17-rc is fine, so it would be good to also check if reverting that commit from 5.17-rc helps.