stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>,
	Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	Alistair Strachan <astrachan@google.com>
Subject: Re: Clang backports for 4.9 and 4.4
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 15:13:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=6rW6Q66O=_fRp-FciD9NA7nhZa=dSWjCsFf7-MHyoqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181119192059.GA31554@flashbox>

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:21 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:17:15AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:52 AM Nathan Chancellor
> > <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:31:35AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > Greg,
> > > > I'm in the process of preparing backports for building 4.9 and 4.4
> > > > kernels with Clang.  Going off of mka's very helpful:
> > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/22/943, I've prepared the list of SHA's
> > > > that were marked UPSTREAM (internal convention used to denote patch
> > > > applies cleanly):
> > > > https://gist.github.com/nickdesaulniers/fe995f4b7c52af8de1a283c0a53562d9.
> > > > But it seems that some of these shas no longer apply cleanly.  I was
> > > > thus curious:
> > > >
> > > > 1. May I send you a pull request with the patches properly backported?
> > > > I'm happy to do the work, just want a green light before backporting
> > > > all of these patches.
> > > > 2. Should I denote in any way if I had to modify any patch to get it
> > > > to apply cleanly?  This helps in code review, IMO.  If so, what
> > > > convention should I use?

Greg,
Would you please cherry pick the following 26 patches from mainline to
4.9.y stable branch? (applied top to bottom)

I verified that they cherry-pick cleanly, and boot on x86_64 and
arm64.  I will follow up with more patches cleaning up the warnings,
adding arm 32b support, and the backport patches themselves when they
do not cherry pick cleanly.
https://travis-ci.com/nickdesaulniers/continuous-integration/builds/91934518

785f11aa595bc3d4e74096cbd598ada54ecc0d81
a37c45cd82e62a361706b9688a984a3a63957321
ebf003f0cfb3705e60d40dedc3ec949176c741af
7dd47b95b0f54f2057d40af6e66d477e3fe95d13
cf0c3e68aa81f992b0301f62e341b710d385bf68

a0ae981eba8f07dbc74bce38fd3a462b69a5bc8e
c3f0d0bc5b01ad90c45276952802455750444b4f
6748cb3c299de1ffbe56733647b01dbcc398c419
433db3e260bc8134d4a46ddf20b3668937e12556
1f318a8bafcfba9f0d623f4870c4e890fd22e659

2c4fd1ac3ff167c91272dc43c7bfd2269ef61557
fdb2726f4e61c5e3abc052f547d5a5f6c0dc5504
9f3f1fd299768782465cb32cdf0dd4528d11f26b
032a2c4f65a2f81c93e161a11197ba19bc14a909
d77698df39a512911586834d303275ea5fda74d0

bfb38988c51e440fd7062ddf3157f7d8b1dd5d70
f4857f4c2ee9aa4e2aacac1a845352b00197fb57
18d5e6c34a8eda438d5ad8b3b15f42dab01bf05d
760b61d76da6d6a99eb245ab61abf71ca5415cea
0426a4e68f18d75515414361de9e3e1445d2644e

696204faa6e8a318320ebb49d9fa69bc8275644d
91ee5b21ee026c49e4e7483de69b55b8b47042be
8f91869766c00622b2eaa8ee567db4f333b78c1a
9e8730b178a2472fca3123e909d6e69cc8127778
8c97023cf0518f172b8cb7a9fffc28b89401abbf

d135b8b5060ea91dd751ff172d179eb4eab1e966
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-20  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-19 18:31 Clang backports for 4.9 and 4.4 Nick Desaulniers
2018-11-19 18:52 ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-11-19 19:17   ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-11-19 19:20     ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-11-19 23:13       ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2018-11-20  7:48         ` Greg KH
2018-11-20 11:26           ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-11-20 12:07             ` Greg KH
2018-11-20 16:46               ` Nathan Chancellor
2018-11-20 16:52                 ` Greg KH
2018-11-20 17:30                   ` Nick Desaulniers
2018-11-21 18:19                     ` Greg KH
2018-11-21 18:38                       ` Nick Desaulniers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKwvOd=6rW6Q66O=_fRp-FciD9NA7nhZa=dSWjCsFf7-MHyoqQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=astrachan@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=mka@chromium.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sspatil@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).