From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CC0C282CA for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44AE217D9 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:03:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549987413; bh=8EGT0xdqv/il9De3JSWzQU2nJqNAtwyLjjBNu8h/6wQ=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=nzELvczs/JwGLKCO9W+OR9LR8mVZTZi+y4rpl5VSqEztizDti0Tw5Gz1d00iFDQZm zaBXrCfs5PtzhByWvNu6KKMbHlxij83f0x6LEnxLy3HA+Mtya6AGJEttDf7gy2PgRB OtDoqSVGruwhHgSiWmXQ1ahDNx6kFnDwKm13JBZY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730567AbfBLQDX (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:03:23 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33790 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728347AbfBLQDX (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:03:23 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f182.google.com (mail-qt1-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0754A218E0; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:03:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549987402; bh=8EGT0xdqv/il9De3JSWzQU2nJqNAtwyLjjBNu8h/6wQ=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=tQiN/Qytw60Dcmpei9FRnTzBJku7+K9W5/vPuqSxbb8eVfc8CHpRwAkB45P+a/LW5 RlcfsvrvsK225TKIvu78MCv/IyNlA9PRKU6EQ5nJu9ZACg+54hg9sKpgqi9VBQlWpX D/4JGFAdL5NMQxXgWj+g3VN3tmFNf6iKnQYow7Rw= Received: by mail-qt1-f182.google.com with SMTP id v10so3494421qtp.8; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:03:21 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZCD5OV6ZnDlBbA5BJ9tJQ1QxqW4itlrr/4pa8OLt26jgzwfB39 VwJqsX19jcGyL/zdFq1nGZt/RhbTfR3VrWfNKA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iam+6/yVnFxn0GKbiSQFfFEr74tEcIazYgDBBeUE5oT6H0niNc0WT76LVJw3bCIV+arGJN8D7RrJghxPHLsbzw= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:25d1:: with SMTP id f17mr3315819qtf.38.1549987401158; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:03:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190121143704.GE29504@arrakis.emea.arm.com> <20190121174234.GC26461@rapoport-lnx> <2bb30550-435a-046c-4f45-21dd594aa695@free.fr> <3c886941-bf9d-f040-b568-ee7a8eba9a04@free.fr> <20190123055414.GA4747@rapoport-lnx> <78f4ea8a-996d-038e-9e33-5ff02fa2c43f@samsung.com> <20190123123143.GE4747@rapoport-lnx> <4b8f82c4-7f8f-b814-c1ec-9902e43963f6@free.fr> <617e0d57-342d-4162-bd21-ece18e481d87@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <617e0d57-342d-4162-bd21-ece18e481d87@free.fr> From: Rob Herring Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:03:09 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] of: fix kmemleak crash caused by imbalance in early memory reservation To: Marc Gonzalez Cc: Frank Rowand , Mike Rapoport , Stephen Rothwell , Marek Szyprowski , Catalin Marinas , Prateek Patel , DT , LKML , stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:47 AM Marc Gonzalez wrote: > > On 04/02/2019 15:37, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.15+ > > Fixes: 3f0c820664483 ("drivers: of: add initialization code for dynamic reserved memory") > > Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski > > Acked-by: Prateek Patel > > Tested-by: Marc Gonzalez > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > > --- > > Resend with DT CCed to reach robh's patch queue > > I added CC: stable, Fixes, and Prateek's ack > > Trim recipients list to minimize inconvenience > > Mike, Stephen, > > I'm confused over commit 3532b3b554a216f30edb841d29eef48521bdc592 in linux-next > "memblock: drop __memblock_alloc_base()" > > It's definitely going to conflict with the proposed patch > over drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c > > Rob, what's the next step then? Rebase it on top of what's in linux-next and apply it to the tree which has the above dependency. I'm guessing that is Andrew Morton's tree. Rob