stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
Cc: lee.jones@linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	cj.chengjian@huawei.com, judy.chenhui@huawei.com,
	zhangjinhao2@huawei.com, nixiaoming@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 1/3] futex: Change locking rules
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:40:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEdQkLfQR9HRobUA@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210309030605.3295183-2-zhengyejian1@huawei.com>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:06:03AM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Currently futex-pi relies on hb->lock to serialize everything. But hb->lock
> creates another set of problems, especially priority inversions on RT where
> hb->lock becomes a rt_mutex itself.
> 
> The rt_mutex::wait_lock is the most obvious protection for keeping the
> futex user space value and the kernel internal pi_state in sync.
> 
> Rework and document the locking so rt_mutex::wait_lock is held accross all
> operations which modify the user space value and the pi state.
> 
> This allows to invoke rt_mutex_unlock() (including deboost) without holding
> hb->lock as a next step.
> 
> Nothing yet relies on the new locking rules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
> Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
> Cc: xlpang@redhat.com
> Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
> Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
> Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com
> Cc: dvhart@infradead.org
> Cc: bristot@redhat.com
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104151.751993333@infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> [Lee: Back-ported in support of a previous futex back-port attempt]
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/futex.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

What is the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-09 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-09  3:06 [PATCH 4.4 0/3] Backport patch series to update Futex from 4.9 Zheng Yejian
2021-03-09  3:06 ` [PATCH 4.4 1/3] futex: Change locking rules Zheng Yejian
2021-03-09 10:40   ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-03-09  3:06 ` [PATCH 4.4 2/3] futex: Cure exit race Zheng Yejian
2021-03-09  3:06 ` [PATCH 4.4 3/3] futex: fix dead code in attach_to_pi_owner() Zheng Yejian
2021-03-09 10:40   ` Greg KH
2021-03-09 18:14     ` Lee Jones
2021-03-10 12:00       ` Greg KH
2021-03-10 13:28         ` Lee Jones
2021-03-10 14:10           ` Greg KH
2021-03-11  1:39             ` Zhengyejian (Zetta)
2021-03-09 10:41 ` [PATCH 4.4 0/3] Backport patch series to update Futex from 4.9 Greg KH
2021-03-11  3:48   ` Zhengyejian (Zetta)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YEdQkLfQR9HRobUA@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=cj.chengjian@huawei.com \
    --cc=judy.chenhui@huawei.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zhangjinhao2@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengyejian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).