From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AA6C433EF for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF02261054 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233498AbhKKNuK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:50:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46432 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232699AbhKKNuK (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:50:10 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEB9460F4A; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:47:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1636638441; bh=9TFTxcUEdEwhp48u9fNkDL4nwF4RxAlnd8sjIj3YoQc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XXnI40erBUzui9bY1inM9UXZaj7r75cqdyYeqmZfqzBxLwvou3n+G5QQ5oZZu5Vzd 4CuKdyCkEifiATxnu+Ibg2qaYnvK8KNZnsvuA6tapAQRozlRKhx1IqIVG3G0v5nLb4 MnyUgYpskTg+mwNRN6ENI2vDagxPkK5nw0Y82c0g5phFIcsKgUd6fSsg+266SfeHyE Daoqmm9aDauY88oN2sBogs/ZRCymaek9QOQBvrYVfuWeQEBXR8nmztWQwv13pDxtdD 9/8zU45xWKxfS/Odm07owHwhWrGFxmn7VCF/NApS9zyPtXdrV6dQiyl69E8GaQfoaq Z4QtCy92Rmdww== Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:47:16 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Michael Walle Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Lukas Wunner , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: fix use-after-free of the add_lock mutex Message-ID: References: <20211111083713.3335171-1-michael@walle.cc> <20cde88dd11fde7f6847506ffcaa67ed@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ser8Hc8y7Eyt67W5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20cde88dd11fde7f6847506ffcaa67ed@walle.cc> X-Cookie: Teutonic: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org --Ser8Hc8y7Eyt67W5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:46:01PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2021-11-11 13:37, schrieb Mark Brown: > > If you are sending a new version of something please flag that in the > > commit message, this helps both people and automated systems identify > > that this is a new version of the same thing. > Are RFC patches eligible to be picked up? I wasn't sure if I had to > resend it at all. But since there was a mistake in the commit message > anyway, I went ahead and the the first "real" version. How would > you flag that? Isn't changing the subject from "[PATCH RFC]" (ok it > was "RFC PATCH", my bad) to "[PATCH]" enough? No, both people and machines are going to get confused. --Ser8Hc8y7Eyt67W5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmGNHuQACgkQJNaLcl1U h9C2Ugf+PquYMxxYsWbB/sZkRXTWaLfsSZc9dPdO82Cc4RXf0ckpdjZA+uHhbles A1xhgfsUNvv9UekloIvZzc61NkcgM8r4GWFFI4skv7fvWxowYtn6iF/g2APvzmvw 18v3TU+IIa4gKXHrYT96Iooo0gi6LmLbHQCI60ggDmMouurmGGLPYJovxJvQmuSs L+tx9obJQrxF3sGG8auD74u165362wU93weIHuN7UCUF0rGWosvopt4C1ekkT1UA cmyV/iSai8oXA2HUERoD21cZEceiWAUgK64v5dOGIRWAU4ne2p6LkTIccdFd0tje qpsy/E+oG8IEsQ2+ta2aE6pcVbyvHQ== =mcCk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Ser8Hc8y7Eyt67W5--