stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>,
	"Qi Zheng" <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Justin Forbes" <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	"Pavel Machek" <pavel@denx.de>,
	"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:39:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZYfYOcqNqOyZ8Yo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211118081852.GM174730@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:18:52AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 09:06:27AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 03:50:17PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > > I really don't think the WCHAN code should use unwinders at all. It's
> > > too damn fragile, and it's too easily triggered from user space.
> > 
> > On x86, esp. with ORC, it pretty much has to. The thing is, the ORC
> > unwinder has been very stable so far. I'm guessing there's some really
> > stupid thing going on, like for example trying to unwind a freed stack.
> > 
> > I *just* managed to reproduce, so let me go have a poke.
> 
> Confirmed, with the below it no longer reproduces. Now, let me go undo
> that and fix the unwinder to not explode while trying to unwind nothing.

OK, so the bug is firmly with 5d1ceb3969b6 ("x86: Fix __get_wchan() for
!STACKTRACE") which lost the try_get_task_stack() that stack_trace_*()
does.

We can ofc trivially re-instate that, but I'm now running with the
below which I suppose is a better fix, hmm?

(obv I still need to look a the other two unwinders)

---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
index e6f7592790af..9261ff1343cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
@@ -352,8 +352,14 @@ static bool deref_stack_reg(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long addr,
 	if (!stack_access_ok(state, addr, sizeof(long)))
 		return false;
 
-	*val = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)addr);
+	pagefault_disable();
+	__get_kernel_nofault(val, addr, unsigned long, Efault);
+	pagefault_enable();
 	return true;
+
+Efault:
+	pagefault_enable();
+	return false;
 }
 
 static bool deref_stack_regs(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long addr,
@@ -367,9 +373,16 @@ static bool deref_stack_regs(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long addr,
 	if (!stack_access_ok(state, addr, sizeof(struct pt_regs)))
 		return false;
 
-	*ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->ip);
-	*sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->sp);
+	pagefault_disable();
+	__get_kernel_nofault(ip, &regs->ip, unsigned long, Efault);
+	__get_kernel_nofault(sp, &regs->sp, unsigned long, Efault);
+	pagefault_enable();
+
 	return true;
+
+Efault:
+	pagefault_enable();
+	return false;
 }
 
 static bool deref_stack_iret_regs(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long addr,
@@ -380,9 +393,16 @@ static bool deref_stack_iret_regs(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long addr
 	if (!stack_access_ok(state, addr, IRET_FRAME_SIZE))
 		return false;
 
-	*ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->ip);
-	*sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(regs->sp);
+	pagefault_disable();
+	__get_kernel_nofault(ip, &regs->ip, unsigned long, Efault);
+	__get_kernel_nofault(sp, &regs->sp, unsigned long, Efault);
+	pagefault_enable();
+
 	return true;
+
+Efault:
+	pagefault_enable();
+	return false;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -396,22 +416,27 @@ static bool deref_stack_iret_regs(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long addr
 static bool get_reg(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned int reg_off,
 		    unsigned long *val)
 {
-	unsigned int reg = reg_off/8;
-
 	if (!state->regs)
 		return false;
 
+	pagefault_disable();
 	if (state->full_regs) {
-		*val = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((unsigned long *)state->regs)[reg]);
+		__get_kernel_nofault(val, (void *)state->regs + reg_off, unsigned long, Efault);
+		pagefault_enable();
 		return true;
 	}
 
 	if (state->prev_regs) {
-		*val = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(((unsigned long *)state->prev_regs)[reg]);
+		__get_kernel_nofault(val, (void *)state->regs + reg_off, unsigned long, Efault);
+		pagefault_enable();
 		return true;
 	}
 
 	return false;
+
+Efault:
+	pagefault_enable();
+	return false;
 }
 
 bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
@@ -673,8 +698,12 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
 		struct inactive_task_frame *frame = (void *)task->thread.sp;
 
 		state->sp = task->thread.sp + sizeof(*frame);
-		state->bp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->bp);
-		state->ip = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(frame->ret_addr);
+
+		pagefault_disable();
+		__get_kernel_nofault(&state->bp, &frame->bp, unsigned long, Efault);
+		__get_kernel_nofault(&state->ip, &frame->ret_addr, unsigned long, Efault);
+		pagefault_enable();
+
 		state->signal = (void *)state->ip == ret_from_fork;
 	}
 
@@ -713,6 +742,8 @@ void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
 
 	return;
 
+Efault:
+	pagefault_enable();
 err:
 	state->error = true;
 the_end:

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-18  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-17 10:19 [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-17 13:37 ` Fox Chen
2021-11-17 14:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-17 14:43   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-17 14:54     ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-17 17:34 ` Jon Hunter
2021-11-17 18:51 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-17 20:25 ` Holger Kiehl
2021-11-18  8:14   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-18 14:08     ` Holger Kiehl
2021-11-18 17:08       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-17 20:35 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-17 21:32 ` Justin Forbes
2021-11-17 23:32   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2021-11-17 23:50     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-11-18  0:16       ` Kees Cook
2021-11-18  6:26         ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-18  8:14           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-18  8:12         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-11-18 17:17           ` Kees Cook
2021-11-18  8:06       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18  8:18         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18  9:39           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-11-18 10:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-18 12:11             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-19  2:04               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-19  9:29                 ` [PATCH] x86: Pin task-stack in __get_wchan() Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-19 10:02                   ` Qi Zheng
2021-11-19 10:22                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-19 10:26                       ` Qi Zheng
2021-11-19 18:16                   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-11-19 18:35                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-22  9:32                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-22 16:14                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-11-18  5:45 ` [PATCH 5.15 000/923] 5.15.3-rc3 review Naresh Kamboju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZYfYOcqNqOyZ8Yo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
    --cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@kernelci.org \
    --cc=pavel@denx.de \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).