From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B75C433EF for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244896AbhLVMhK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:37:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36494 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233073AbhLVMhJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 07:37:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CAB4C061401; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:37:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id s1so505830pga.5; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:37:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UZz7xhafkkHpJkMgl/kac5c4UCSL804TVcwmmdEcK/0=; b=nsK2TtW3n6e1+xlg1RZyMo4ycIQFl2Xn4YC2120yajzQ6jPjoaIwA6gZz1sGETLPUL Rfa/LfPmrvEWU4Ei7szxx6trUEnm0qqv0dd2AiuW7yC9Q8Kmj65hZzxMmeDD3bHL/spD 7R1e6dtfBRTi2XLI4rk8HxD+FiGZii7cJPWWjtz94MCdYnZAByH7nd70yU8pbinerVFe czLvEyE+RXSPw54P41GoQuj/8IBRLGfLgE/5wHW3f/xNdt8UjnFKxL/mLLdLjPFFyQdm 00IoO5rCraGZGFjUndcF10Su7RbUd0SQh9K+J3+3MKToFMJm3/n6GSWfk3qCY+FDHmMQ CjxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=UZz7xhafkkHpJkMgl/kac5c4UCSL804TVcwmmdEcK/0=; b=iovJylkErsXzynctPTQVjz+IDCGpCA6MPSZeFhoFPb7McpuqV4uaG0fe2kmPbLYLz2 1FaSEAzOU6kP15C4YEX7A2LPDUsv+6h2Qje0wwCjMu0a3UABF0+sc1chv4nhRwyOGvXF BaCBy0NiRonJe/5j55dwxc1CaumAvzRkutSF6t6dg+PwzWWuGgWEyuDF/wgD/G5Titw5 Z2pruoaiN4p13fuQlSQqx88IREIdL5cChGeKOAddFmdnD0BT2Pc3pCv1UFfY6DnRGsKS dBGZh874wtzXyajhx35KSjBBQ7uP/n47kXG4s1Vc8sKLQzR7rAMw3mNWfQ5wbIkGHrjd y2Hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KPiwscRhzP4APoFeRXLzqTbc0qxRXtxY3hvi8aWo3tTClewUG K7jRiXzyUGTQtChrj3D496Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJywzhxYDDrq26wikSanWRvBdbTroGbSbcvCsRISQViIDfeWIm5m9pfq2nL//FWIWUPg7CAIoQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6dc8:: with SMTP id i191mr333146pgc.34.1640176628671; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:37:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ip-172-31-30-232.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal (ec2-18-181-137-102.ap-northeast-1.compute.amazonaws.com. [18.181.137.102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id om10sm2616130pjb.13.2021.12.22.04.37.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 Dec 2021 04:37:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:37:03 +0000 From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Baoquan He , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux.com, John.p.donnelly@oracle.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Vlastimil Babka Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] mm/slub: do not create dma-kmalloc if no managed pages in DMA zone Message-ID: References: <20211213122712.23805-1-bhe@redhat.com> <20211213122712.23805-6-bhe@redhat.com> <20211213134319.GA997240@odroid> <20211214053253.GB2216@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20211221085623.GA7733@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211221085623.GA7733@lst.de> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hello Christoph. On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 09:56:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:38:27AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote: > > My understanding is any buffer requested from kmalloc (without > > GFP_DMA/DMA32) can be used by device driver because it allocates > > continuous physical memory. It doesn't mean that buffer allocated > > with kmalloc is free of addressing limitation. > > Yes. > > > > > the addressing limitation comes from the capability of device, not > > allocation size. if you allocate memory using alloc_pages() or kmalloc(), > > the device has same limitation. and vmalloc can't be used for > > devices because they have no MMU. > > vmalloc can be used as well, it just needs to be setup as a scatterlist > and needs a little lover for DMA challenged platforms with the > invalidate_kernel_vmap_range and flush_kernel_vmap_range helpers. Oh I misunderstood this. Underlying physical address of vmalloc()-allocated memory can be mapped using DMA API, and it needs to be setup as scatterlist because the allocated memory is not physically continuous. Right? BTW, looking at the API I think the scsi case can be converted to use dma_alloc_pages(). but driver requires 512 bytes of buffer and the API supports allocating by at least page size. It's not a big problem as it allocates a single buffer but in other cases maybe not. Can't we use dma pool for non-coherent pages? Thanks, Hyeonggon. > > But we can map memory outside DMA zone into bounce buffer (which resides > > in DMA zone) using DMA API. > > Yes, although in a few specific cases the bounce buffer could also come > from somewhere else.