From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96995C433F5 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239926AbiAKMfa (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:35:30 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58358 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238836AbiAKMf3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 07:35:29 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7950FC06173F; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:35:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id h10so22536985wrb.1; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:35:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=enAGouNRr4bikjAZlU4a9bVkpUXhqTGaaqOH4ivhDfQ=; b=bkE3KfkcimcJg73VBiVXDBduhaN7ZNLBHRlL3sFzmiyzwPVxFb+1MsFv4O1ni569Nc fvDkTp4+kVJK9De34qTVU6AxvePsH6woUXKPnFiXq29Dw/CHKVcQpHDozK+IwTpJQTZ5 MnGV+AYN9E2KQiElRq4lyv4YNCA8FyizDT1niQhkgeLfGZ9/u57rFc2uhhPIwofsiTkm k9J7YmQ6/7eL0jpbek2ALo+olZqCMNKrWdhDST5Js89rIMOaK1DPJ2wbf91cVmF5c3Kp OEyAgwWzwgEjJO3/LXHHvqm8/Wz1r6eoZ13JiJE2LFln73yrQevYVU9C4wGRnQnbWFcs adgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=enAGouNRr4bikjAZlU4a9bVkpUXhqTGaaqOH4ivhDfQ=; b=nF3z683s7OCiqVOgUdwXSb67AYNur0mBb1ZcBZFa+IqJneiYy/UbHI0ko/K+z1u71T rMS4jaNeLGcBYc1t/roxzdxHSkCj0WLu0EGCCPixVU2pDQfYvdqjRtKlq8OQ/h4dpUvj gbVYUcWZtddJKjeWs6M7DwVjFJ7Dmk1x/MhQcLOmjnwMrv6zUwmXmLfcSUg764dm91gT gGmNWv10rwS/UAppHGMqbP4lruLikQroGsMqGM3IszXBYxRIOWXjQxkPXQeZeM2NQAVU 2okJpwtXNAR5mCyDdzaeF3EWDWzP2eChgEXWpL++bjjj5YjVEsl/cYhTOlcRKbniD1k4 dwsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331X4hNaUgln/uoeZLa/2kEgpSuiGK6KAFxle6RBFrbrRzNEJvz uaUR4E+Uw0ZIipiFuMmVP7k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwJu4ksEj3n5hlphta5S6IY9c/AUrY1LB/TNcIQB7Z+z4I/uuXQSSYiwFRVltik5xF+rX/7g== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d0a:: with SMTP id e10mr3643247wrq.327.1641904528081; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:35:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m3sm9057851wrv.95.2022.01.11.04.35.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Jan 2022 04:35:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:35:25 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/21] 4.19.225-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220110071813.967414697@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220110071813.967414697@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 08:23:01AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.225 release. > There are 21 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 12 Jan 2022 07:18:05 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/609 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip