From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2655AC433F5 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234069AbiADPvy (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:51:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45792 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232799AbiADPvy (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:51:54 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B920C061761; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 07:51:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id l4so23530321wmq.3; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 07:51:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uIz2yUqwMyhBuN8YGnETBaxGt3m02AG4Hct/FwHTsQU=; b=gR5YA141XiRw1cgI2hkrHAlkROrC/M2q9CYYmt0VLrZ5N19jCyVr4rABC6FC2suEl2 RYN+fF2uC+tfIakg7Hir1zSwHoRNRRG2XccKnu223D4EvpP8RjXjlbIAf2++wM6BYae7 9eVOM5338FVpZ0ly/kFY0O1Eacic5nJnLSBjEt4OODJ4QB0amU76LVD0hy6xrMxmy+R1 y3Hg8ZjAQWxsweu+knW+19fWaQ3Tb0H44orjE2f6AVWno9pS6Oz5yFFVLCtr+885BFxL NVD5WwJDqiYY07rfbbeXp3bSAQvtJvxTE9I4FlSQfqjWeHTPswF/zdytIFhEjhMUkAC3 choA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uIz2yUqwMyhBuN8YGnETBaxGt3m02AG4Hct/FwHTsQU=; b=KR/9p4DUgeqGfF6afxwJwUapuKeS27zHUmLlt2KMzfltxaqhJjEpnoW/8ZNJ3mS/GV nMO2zJq8Hn5LUHCEMvKziIXiV0TA2iQqp31buslS5+Wm2Oqk0DICm25LuqwAEpa+5dKd WN1V56WmK2+O8tqUBOEGMd5x/TxjQoQ2ccxr6XMjuzimfEE5yZG1/9YMyGTsL59Wv1pa udrv9yadXVJ2ujOpTKX29TRxCBLSeBSa1Cftk3vW3zrE9aR4iCvB1yr5ZsleBDGgSZuU l5EnRlL7rvUO/5Prnx83geY5vd5nuQgL5t9vdq5mnE+9+01DOLe0ymCojwp7JFabXRFG LyjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UD82VeD06JMbii5wzhvOC0qZeK2OfPckHumyIw1WOadlT9kHA A1O99/joDW0oU4j/L+wNOKXW2V6t7CI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4nf89nIW0fi4iCrT/EO75BEnTK2ifGpQri3TQSKu4PeGzd5kb0TgS2uQFBaDgsrMVIT8ZJA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4406:: with SMTP id r6mr42576627wma.42.1641311512179; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 07:51:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o11sm41171209wmq.15.2022.01.04.07.51.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Jan 2022 07:51:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:51:50 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/27] 4.19.224-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220103142052.162223000@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220103142052.162223000@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 03:23:40PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.224 release. > There are 27 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Jan 2022 14:20:40 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 63 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 116 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 2 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20211214): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/581 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip