From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9344C28CF5 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240568AbiAZLRl (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:17:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41478 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240567AbiAZLRk (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 06:17:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66080C06161C; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:17:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id r7so2355843wmq.5; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:17:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=t47oAXxusbQX268+jco67eiS/8CQ1VFbXiv59jxtU3c=; b=hvR9Sai7emFri6uqLYucqxnjJ0o4n0f9Gki8GXzqyR+lz0/iHxMctd0Z+Ozdsd93iQ lfBg6ihc1FDM0/4JzN+K83SjXdzmsLYHxmLCCPeO4TbFnO78SEPAxhu7TvIxcszPylTJ Jt7SiQLUGfjsuaBjBnbt1pU0/tkv721H9qkI/JArFa4LAh6AXBFZv67IaisadSYbYd89 NlpvJS/E1ZlsNeMXukS96Dthulz1EyyYAJHRa6W8t30TM53T0Oxcn3jlUKaQU3KCJHfl ijENNjuoKQNVCzrB7XK6+yPQ5hDiGSGc1PrCnFMIFP5SRU4x2UDdGX3BQtpazZw55H8j I3BQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=t47oAXxusbQX268+jco67eiS/8CQ1VFbXiv59jxtU3c=; b=ZCtWO9R6YHoh5F1NVupqwEjM4tosgx4lEpVx2XspD1qHv1ncOKnXesehYEJcnAh1ze ZXQ0sYfQ+GnZFoXiIyL11K2vRREn3X7DsT1fjBGS+2Gc3KTexPFKl9KxFXFJxoujuN+B tSQGbVmucsDwaYgftMPA2gXZ8AzhwJPVwRfQwUOpHEbupQNdCepBiFjCDCc0CecuVda2 Ozt4HXBM1FLj2jd7QOWSImgY9Uhh8U13UGmDuHvIYJ3bvDL0+ne/1RYBOmKRuNrTTEvu gOdE9UdAvQDIpBuWvedYTO1/UASMMVF1sjubrmDJz63ODXoS/QbXbZzSUYWHI38x2e9n UVMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jw3W/o9OB91iriRCO/poFffiQumh7Efc/i6Hwlj8ctWDD7en2 Dy5jmQmjCJj3r+fpktE8c98= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNaVgBlxy+T7qq2LDiVY9pADohFo112yD5ywo7B9/erVjLE1yiLuoW+uwJdVclvWJ6R3yhpg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4112:: with SMTP id j18mr7074144wmi.72.1643195858909; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:17:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p15sm19110387wrq.66.2022.01.26.03.17.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 03:17:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:17:36 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/560] 5.10.94-rc2 review Message-ID: References: <20220125155348.141138434@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220125155348.141138434@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:32:31PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.94 release. > There are 560 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:52:30 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/657 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/659 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip