From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9877C433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 13:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231985AbiDFNXY (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:23:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44240 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232417AbiDFNWK (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:22:10 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 809F3339FDD; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 03:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id j12so2442389wrb.5; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 03:11:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rewLxARlDutpxZVy1V6PniivDPDX+d6Q7e/t7j2TQ9I=; b=iEF6Z7HX9oHKOuONDurK+PX+GZkKuDbAUOv3nt0bZXmaG/KOQ/z7viygxZtfshj80G b6JaS/IqzSx3HyQPdBTXpv7+buQ57SZKMSQ/Ud1jIh2viAnK709Gd2Y2NLoD1VtRg88I 7zvnTY+u08EHLsH1RGKnT+wFNPglsJPcxvTQWpds+83+u/a0naZLcSmk9UqHThsPaLH0 fW/6RVxQL7YyqRv8eLPPPxcscIYwg5/9BbKYWMvbWr8mvHmeq+sLv/9S9a453rgd1ATz yzkLVNQvDjzw7vMU1N9lK1MDgMT/Imt9Q9PsfV215kkJtCjFyco9sVDW2D5eypclsevz bkkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rewLxARlDutpxZVy1V6PniivDPDX+d6Q7e/t7j2TQ9I=; b=Ee1aZ2yG68v5oMsiWuQJOGeruMeldSqCheM8m105n/RsYlEMNH5AzsTJ99voIl8BAF D3fC7NYE0b5uMoXs5RSfLvuZSPqlVsvpPWdo+3LNO3uirYzmoZL5uBb+32g5NzTWajF0 HdrHV9VdnZqeuRgVfJLCzsP+jr9wp37Gw95SE+DNTk/tYFLuOv0I+qVKRHniJbxAqWbt Gvyi7fEbXgIspX7kTkkkduc1WvHF/9Hp0JvwWheqixIyjgPHeeDKjnkxxT4Vf7xbhRve acEwRH+dOK7uCRhJ/v+e/g5gXN5Vo/aBIYa+cRguNcPsZTR95bDdogdFuAAG1xYQ8IJ4 8cHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531JxkUImI8+B+M73JjS3whVN2djPebhGAXXZfmQoh1+szktO9ki DaMqfcN812jlmFC75jLwXAdf0o+9QdU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzesOXDC1OhYcnwzac5A07ZQHCzPcP/8TYpSFlUHv6bm9QjZrqaYLnytwddpSX8KlYSNYt4g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f390:0:b0:206:16e1:b020 with SMTP id m16-20020adff390000000b0020616e1b020mr5894842wro.194.1649239817444; Wed, 06 Apr 2022 03:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([167.98.27.226]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s11-20020a5d6a8b000000b002060a8c810bsm10424560wru.24.2022.04.06.03.10.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Apr 2022 03:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 11:10:15 +0100 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/913] 5.15.33-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220405070339.801210740@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220405070339.801210740@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 09:17:42AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.33 release. > There are 913 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 07 Apr 2022 07:01:33 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 62 configs -> no failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 100 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220314): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/980 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/982 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/984 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip