From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43296ECAAA1 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229518AbiH3KkR (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:40:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36124 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229541AbiH3KkQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 06:40:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB20819294; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 03:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id m16so13592823wru.9; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 03:40:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=u2aT7dmggfgjN0W9ssu0rPXEKCYVEEZc+Qb0rHdTMIw=; b=gGM14XDJoC+HDJdGZj55275AZirVYSP9CxKzz629P43oEZnJL8OhRMuwo+GKtYsNcn f2isCJfL1JoipvrWnoKmP3Ejq8Llun6wnHgRrriUDiEptkZKoBFqD5MFLOQJyaIq0AEx CZBQbcI6EM33cOC7TSzciVVHCU3vfO5e1NUcysrtjoPmgEiIEEIw2Eofb7ubVxSKlsVK NG3I4CcTxdX5QPzITppLSLxCCOYxlKaxBx74X0qIHo4v8yEdjKWSIVRoR7f3Og9uptqQ RHottnZ+looawCjMAEtoGiOTldd5PzlMzUnJpuA7J1MdtTXyAsXZLXaC4MJEZ1NYkgAq yfkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=u2aT7dmggfgjN0W9ssu0rPXEKCYVEEZc+Qb0rHdTMIw=; b=HYVeDYuakp3iuXaqcofU6X1ohIQAL59Dl2YFvpfn2srPJLYJ3ZwF56X+3SjfqDfptu UpzvL1MGzzEo2DAzWWdqktYcv4dQwCKHmX8pXw6OevlexcVUw/Aqvav3InUkoToUFp2B TgGr3p3FLhd1ySAb1xKj6Ivpu9TLm3H+1oxV6Ar8bMqwB8asB4ObM9sDNiBtSc3BjhbL BdAhibjyxFRd4bm6vdODX8VDPxb2lCWKbNLPfggPZfvonRuERGd3y3j05uAXcCxuIi1L KjiadP1aHaXowvAZEbtKHZVTlMD8bi45+x6xnZrniZYFq57Yx+X/pFmlUuier12UhWuR YqdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1+qRvBYaltvGrsVkCUHoJEFtmeCdS2jbHEr30U/RR2jv29ZRpf iWfhEPZ9ktBbEC8AyUps6YOoWIbXMvxwpQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6MvlcmbDpPkYSUu2obN+gKBf2KWc53tJkBX3BGVZ/K92uHD/HVNSj0F+N0OrgVUODH6BzRcQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f250:0:b0:226:cf7b:d5ba with SMTP id b16-20020adff250000000b00226cf7bd5bamr8929373wrp.570.1661856013447; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 03:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f28-20020a5d58fc000000b0021e4829d359sm9024247wrd.39.2022.08.30.03.40.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 30 Aug 2022 03:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 11:40:11 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/136] 5.15.64-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220829105804.609007228@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220829105804.609007228@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.64 release. > There are 136 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Aug 2022 10:57:37 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220819): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1729 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1733 [3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1735 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip