From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB97C433FE for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 11:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229605AbiJDLlm (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:41:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229796AbiJDLll (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2022 07:41:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A17E4E628; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 04:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id u10so20776092wrq.2; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:41:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=PjATV6AFt3O7cSwlwzhJIma0FMFIHMnip2KNJZuWX0A=; b=Q31SGCKr7/fIphu/HvZz66iYDjZ/N5E0mFSCR1P7rqfWaUtpjUojnc3kTRoB0ZeA8+ 7lDr1i6JRQX5tp9+2FZq4jsprQiIxvcLLlDLWwkrYX6xafWYTFLFwJMHoeuVQgJp5GIW wdZS9vDOrz2wb9iCiDcxDnj6YsMKiGrCKRsoTMtH5CnzV4o7r65vCJX6G25kvNAWP24I YIyzp0crPYvZp+57RDVL5EdDIDEflSFU6Y8k7iYF+NGoJxscf/+puCyHy1DbyvQY/7HW /Jz3JMX4bWjP/M28NOK4+oYkY82zOfnQ6UOa/areA7jkDAzdoVze8K/fTwuiQRoJEAg4 EFgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=PjATV6AFt3O7cSwlwzhJIma0FMFIHMnip2KNJZuWX0A=; b=Eh5dz9nPZzw2RLR1+btg6hFty5wazjtFoYBaHP5U5QYmayExtNEmT6fi72BsYnKR18 wi3oSoMdqU/Tk+tMtEqVdNCFzC6vxU7A2EorlKCE3gLhivvlEyAX+cCymp7oCkPnM7J4 aWA83EWwPpgV1AvQimyaElXCnpKbDsxGHiBJVh7bfNLF5qT/ILmNDB2ZRY6/AKkhlfZi k4M5P7dFqLkcUxPy9oWPzlLIEU2vqFfUx8CpucRqaqVwICZj4cPgpO84hscgUNEhe0Wr pW5cy0V+8zGfmayu+31FyVQ1wICgNjpaweIzXfDP0bxSfNr4pU87CiDg4y7Zi0FKlWfE MVkA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2XLG1WJzjKCrlYJBuRzp5TAogfqx79uWc8QG7ewwDDc4BWpHCQ bgORhy/Nr7jFYB1pOJrFwXo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6qH4ss0ZUaeqw2pLb2SZBilQywIJ3PY/R+YUYWnOVNofQ7KW9QCzXxGv6H6d7vImXyQ6oRWg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:edc3:0:b0:22c:dbe9:e3b6 with SMTP id v3-20020adfedc3000000b0022cdbe9e3b6mr14331079wro.282.1664883696133; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian (host-78-150-37-98.as13285.net. [78.150.37.98]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l7-20020a05600c4f0700b003b4c979e6bcsm20027569wmq.10.2022.10.04.04.41.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Oct 2022 04:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 12:41:34 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.72-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20221003070721.971297651@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221003070721.971297651@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 09:10:25AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.72 release. > There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:07:06 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220925): mips: 62 configs -> no failure arm: 99 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure csky allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1946 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1949 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip