From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0295CC43331 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94572087E for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:43:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389552AbfKGQnV (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:43:21 -0500 Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]:56281 "EHLO imap1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728965AbfKGQnV (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:43:21 -0500 Received: from [167.98.27.226] (helo=xylophone) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1iSksQ-0004rW-9m; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:43:18 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/93] 4.19.81-stable review From: Ben Hutchings To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 16:43:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20191106201818.GA105063@kroah.com> References: <20191027203251.029297948@linuxfoundation.org> <20191029162419.cumhku6smn2x2bq4@ucw.cz> <20191029180233.GA587491@kroah.com> <20191106185932.GA2183@amd> <20191106201818.GA105063@kroah.com> Organization: Codethink Ltd. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:18 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 07:59:32PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: [...] > > I'm confused. You said "by Tue ... 08:27:02 PM UTC". That 8 PM is 20h, > > but did the release on 10h GMT+1, or 9h UTC -- 9 AM.... so like 11 > > hours early, if I got the timezones right. > > > > Does PM mean something else in the above context? > > Ugh, no, you are right, I was ignoring the PM thing, I thought the -u > option to date would give me a 24 hour date string, and so I thought > that was 8:27 in the morning. > > Let me mess around with 'date' to see if I can come up with a better > string to use here. I guess: > date --rfc-3339=seconds -u > would probably be best? The --rfc-822 option should give you something close to the current format, but with 24-hour numbering. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Software Developer Codethink Ltd https://www.codethink.co.uk/ Dale House, 35 Dale Street Manchester, M1 2HF, United Kingdom