From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F792C32751 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 20:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51723208C3 for ; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 20:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726648AbfHJUzG (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Aug 2019 16:55:06 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:53736 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726169AbfHJUnr (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Aug 2019 16:43:47 -0400 Received: from [192.168.4.242] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hwYDI-00052q-Hw; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 21:43:44 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hwYDI-0003Xa-Ak; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 21:43:44 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov , "YueHaibing" , "Steffen Klassert" , "Hulk Robot" , "Herbert Xu" Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 21:40:07 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 002/157] xfrm: policy: Fix out-of-bound array accesses in __xfrm_policy_unlink In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.242 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 3.16.72-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: YueHaibing commit b805d78d300bcf2c83d6df7da0c818b0fee41427 upstream. UBSAN report this: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1289:24 index 6 is out of range for type 'unsigned int [6]' CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.4.162-514.55.6.9.x86_64+ #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 0000000000000000 1466cf39b41b23c9 ffff8801f6b07a58 ffffffff81cb35f4 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffff83230f9c ffffffff81cb34e0 ffff8801f6b07a80 ffff8801f6b07a20 1466cf39b41b23c9 ffffffff851706e0 ffff8801f6b07ae8 Call Trace: [] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [inline] [] dump_stack+0x114/0x1a0 lib/dump_stack.c:51 [] ubsan_epilogue+0x12/0x8f lib/ubsan.c:164 [] __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x16e/0x1b2 lib/ubsan.c:382 [] __xfrm_policy_unlink+0x3dd/0x5b0 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1289 [] xfrm_policy_delete+0x52/0xb0 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1309 [] xfrm_policy_timer+0x30b/0x590 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:243 [] call_timer_fn+0x237/0x990 kernel/time/timer.c:1144 [] __run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1218 [inline] [] run_timer_softirq+0x6ce/0xb80 kernel/time/timer.c:1401 [] __do_softirq+0x299/0xe10 kernel/softirq.c:273 [] invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:350 [inline] [] irq_exit+0x216/0x2c0 kernel/softirq.c:391 [] exiting_irq arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:652 [inline] [] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x8b/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:926 [] apic_timer_interrupt+0xa5/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:735 [] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:52 [] arch_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:111 [inline] [] default_idle+0x27/0x430 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:446 [] arch_cpu_idle+0x15/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:437 [] default_idle_call+0x53/0x90 kernel/sched/idle.c:92 [] cpuidle_idle_call kernel/sched/idle.c:156 [inline] [] cpu_idle_loop kernel/sched/idle.c:251 [inline] [] cpu_startup_entry+0x60d/0x9a0 kernel/sched/idle.c:299 [] start_secondary+0x3c9/0x560 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:245 The issue is triggered as this: xfrm_add_policy -->verify_newpolicy_info //check the index provided by user with XFRM_POLICY_MAX //In my case, the index is 0x6E6BB6, so it pass the check. -->xfrm_policy_construct //copy the user's policy and set xfrm_policy_timer -->xfrm_policy_insert --> __xfrm_policy_link //use the orgin dir, in my case is 2 --> xfrm_gen_index //generate policy index, there is 0x6E6BB6 then xfrm_policy_timer be fired xfrm_policy_timer --> xfrm_policy_id2dir //get dir from (policy index & 7), in my case is 6 --> xfrm_policy_delete --> __xfrm_policy_unlink //access policy_count[dir], trigger out of range access Add xfrm_policy_id2dir check in verify_newpolicy_info, make sure the computed dir is valid, to fix the issue. Reported-by: Hulk Robot Fixes: e682adf021be ("xfrm: Try to honor policy index if it's supplied by user") Signed-off-by: YueHaibing Acked-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ static int verify_newpolicy_info(struct ret = verify_policy_dir(p->dir); if (ret) return ret; - if (p->index && ((p->index & XFRM_POLICY_MAX) != p->dir)) + if (p->index && (xfrm_policy_id2dir(p->index) != p->dir)) return -EINVAL; return 0;