From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f65.google.com (mail-qv1-f65.google.com [209.85.219.65]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.5114.1599680730419923784 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:45:30 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=google header.b=D5vSVCZM; spf=pass (domain: linuxfoundation.org, ip: 209.85.219.65, mailfrom: konstantin@linuxfoundation.org) Received: by mail-qv1-f65.google.com with SMTP id cy2so2192527qvb.0 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:45:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vD9JE1CTVwys84Z66Ks9dK6lH+UPG6AO9eVS8pmT1NI=; b=D5vSVCZMrne9nrnWwi65Q7A180uCxRiOVXmD7apnyQ5QHzURCygUqNCcs8qfieD7sv A2Qhyn9jkx6UJAUls/W2hcZRnC28ZG7v4ZTO21xKNLe0C2qwwPrOAwJzYCbfpxMFaHMA ZjuHbXYqrTmX6UsjeE/50bmU+QesdV4jupXhQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vD9JE1CTVwys84Z66Ks9dK6lH+UPG6AO9eVS8pmT1NI=; b=EDiNKS5gX1TqW4n9uMdguyJKtZoY5yFPE6fLm6MGeZD6o9KRe96YiikmYtsvP3qzyR gmGJqLpGfLhMS8ZS/TVEXicCgVCUgX1kCg1AWrHXPoA6/K+OGum/BI7qUztjp1AnzL4H xajSgZ1oIAWhnDTZqosKw33kM7xcUNOnyZcCCr8dRbXIV2UVWhqSkmUccn/UxT/Gw2DH qZUOJSbqArhPPIbAeThroeBZC+9ucoHQZIcy6ul3FdM4XEcCYuMQOXr/W6Fl+6DuEI+r aShKvRXr1x/GsJp+rm73elo5Kkn+++hGfBDAZUON9HRl1XJZJWqWteeneURfx1Jrhstk JlEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530v3uIY1cvAa9RCh63N0wQtXQVIyz/dRj8VP82dMXIPevywSiXK P+T1a+7KJnUAo7VKxZ7/Icm5USNuu6VJfGkU X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6ckK8fp9ScqR88e3jCk1EcKKJNhWBCYLppQ3WnVmvC4lwftNxgqbZYzvyK1YubV20noQi7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:8b:: with SMTP id n11mr5631613qvr.60.1599680729282; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:45:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 184sm3670669qkl.104.2020.09.09.12.45.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 12:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:45:27 -0400 From: "Konstantin Ryabitsev" To: tools@linux.kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com Cc: kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [tools] [PATCH] b4: add an --apply option for b4 am Message-ID: <20200909194527.ig2b4ayod7esd2a3@chatter.i7.local> References: <73e01862e01dc42fe853365e4babe1f9d8c2e839.1598283790.git.josef@toxicpanda.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <73e01862e01dc42fe853365e4babe1f9d8c2e839.1598283790.git.josef@toxicpanda.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:43:21AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > I'm infinitely lazy and would rather not have to copy and paste the git > am command to run. This patch adds a --apply/-a option to git am so > it'll go ahead and run git am so I can get to the work of reviewing a > patch series. I've considered this many times, but I thus far prefer not to do it, as we generally try not to touch the developer's tree in order to avoid any potential badness. The functionality you want can be easily achieved with "-o- | git am", so you can make sure to heed any error messages first without it, and then with it: b4 am (perform the review) b4 am -s -l -o- | git am Would you be willing to use that, or do you think we really need an --apply option? -K