From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>,
tools@linux.kernel.org, users@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: b4: introducing b4 shazam (like b4 am -o- | git am)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 15:07:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929180726.GY3544071@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqL-_GhC0L7O5BugC6P_TjhoqL_p3dgBmHuoJfX0fy8gaw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 08:39:25AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Is there a defined right order for Link and committer's Sob? Either we
> have to define what that is for b4 to implement or b4 has to be
> configurable. If the committer != author, then Link followed by Sob
> makes sense. But what about committing your own patches? If you
> strictly follow the patch trail, you'd end up with your Sob twice:
> Sob, Link, Sob. In these cases, I've been putting Link last and a
> single Sob.
I've been deliberately sorting things to be
Cc: stable
Fixes: xx
Link: xx
<everything else in chronological order>
Ie I think the cc/fixes information is important and should be
highlighted at the top and the link is sort of a breakpoint indicating
that the following is chronological providence information.
I see lots of other things too. Personally I think b4 should push a
reasonable opinion for the colour of this bike shed..
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-21 20:25 b4: introducing b4 shazam (like b4 am -o- | git am) Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-09-22 17:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-22 18:21 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-09-28 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-29 21:18 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-09-29 23:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-30 14:45 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-10-01 16:20 ` Mark Brown
2021-09-23 8:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-24 21:08 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-09-28 18:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-29 13:39 ` Rob Herring
2021-09-29 17:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-29 18:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-09-29 14:27 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2021-10-19 14:49 ` Rob Herring
2021-10-19 16:30 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210929180726.GY3544071@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tools@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).