From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] Gmail message ID finder Chrome extension
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:31:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaF5BT+BQo0iq0pg+-W_4mKOYYSGBB9j9O3fpTdSqYO-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200329171313.s5qe5ofvmh3uoy7z@chatter.i7.local>
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 7:13 PM Konstantin Ryabitsev
<konstantin@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The way I envision this could work is if we define workflows based on
> labels. E.g.:
>
> 1. You label a message with "Accepted"
> 2. You run "b4 gmail apply Accepted" (or an agent process runs that)
> 3. We then try to:
> - retrieve patch series using lore and your inbox as sources
> - make an am-ready mbox
> - apply to a branch provided in a mapping config
> "e.g. Accepted->refs/heads/pending"
> 4. If "git am" fails on a series, we label the thread as
> "Review-Required" and move to the next one
> 5. If it succeeds, we add the label "Applied"
That works for me. I have noticed that some people have this
two-step workflow of first tagging stuff (or moving it to some
folder I guess if they use e.g. mutt) and then as second step
do the application and tag stuff as applied and send out mails.
I usually prefer the more
direct "this one patch, apply it, resolved conflicts done" on a
one-by-one basis that's why I wanted it right in the UI.
But I suppose I can just tag one message at the time if I
insist :D
If there is a series I guess you just tag the 00/nn patch and
it picks the whole series?
Being able to just use gmail is really low threshold and can bring
new maintainers in and up to speed I think.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-30 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 16:54 Gmail message ID finder Chrome extension Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-03-28 2:07 ` [kernel.org users] " Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-03-29 14:54 ` Linus Walleij
2020-03-29 17:13 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2020-03-30 20:31 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2020-03-31 8:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdaF5BT+BQo0iq0pg+-W_4mKOYYSGBB9j9O3fpTdSqYO-Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=konstantin@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=tools@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=users@linux.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).