From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: New ML for TPM and IMA
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:40:14 -0700
Message-ID: <1505497214.27581.9.camel@perches.com>
References: <20170915171825.5zjit5vsrvxgmvrb@linux.intel.com>
         <1505496336.27581.7.camel@perches.com>
         <20170915173632.6qfvtkj6yqzclsb2@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170915173632.6qfvtkj6yqzclsb2@linux.intel.com>
Sender: owner-linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:36 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:25:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:18 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
[]
> > > We decided to create a new mailing list linux-integrit@vger.kernel.org
> > > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies.
[]
> > And is there to be an update to the MAINTAINERS file entries?
[]
> Yes, I'll get onto it. BTW, do we need two entries for TPM in the
> MAINTAINERS file or can I merge those?

As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections,
I think you need both entries.