Re: [tpmdd-devel] New ML for TPM and IMA

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] New ML for TPM and IMA
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:01:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505498511.27581.11.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170915175715.nl3m5vcrelykopx3@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:57 -0700, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:47:06AM -0700, Peter Huewe wrote:
> > Am 15. September 2017 10:40:14 GMT-07:00 schrieb Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>:
> > > As the individual maintainers are different for the two sections,
> > > I think you need both entries.
> > 
> > Try to get a hold of ashley and ask whether she is actively maintaining.
> > 
> > While updating Maintainers I vote for removing Marcel Selhorst for tpm.
> > 
> > You can keep me for now :)
> > Peter
> 
> During the last bit less than couple of years I've been maintaining
> TPM and a bit less than four years I've been contributing I've never
> heard anything of Ashley.
> 
> What is the expiration time?

There is no fixed time at all.
Generally when the email bounces or when the maintainer resigns.
(involuntarily or not...)

It seems a couple years since Ashley signed anything and five years
since Marcel Selhorst signed anything.

It's polite to add a CREDITS entry when removing inactive maintainers.