From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not disable driver and bus shutdown hook when class shutdown hook is set.
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:30:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170810163057.GA21485@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170810121811.2741dccc@kitsune.suse.cz>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:18:11PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > The bus disables the driver callback, on the expectation that the bus
> > implementation will do it.
>
> Which is totally sound design not prone to errors.
Well, I agree it isn't the easiest...
> > Existing bus implementations do properly chain to driver shutdown (eg
> > look at mmc_bus_shutdown) and it appears to have been written like
>
> Neither isa nor ibmebus does. These are two random buses I tried to
> look at.
I'm not following, I see this:
static void ibmebus_bus_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
{
struct platform_device *of_dev = to_platform_device(dev);
struct platform_driver *drv = to_platform_driver(dev->driver);
if (dev->driver && drv->shutdown)
drv->shutdown(of_dev);
}
It looks to me like in this case the struct device_driver shutdown is
not used, and instead the struct platform_driver shutdown is called.
> > this so that the bus can insert code before and after calling the
> > driver shutdown.
>
> So basically there is bus pre-shutdown and post-shutdown hook jumbled
> together in one function.
and a redirect, apparently.
> While I can understand the concept of post-shutdown hook I wonder
> what gross hack would require a pre-shutdown hook.
TPM requires pre-shutdown. It fences off access to the TPM so the TPM
can have a clean shutdown. We cannot do a clean TPM shutdown if there
is a possibility of another transaction being send to the TPM. TPM's
have non-volatile state and record if they were not shut down
properly, so doing this is actually quite important.
> The Linux development process at its best. There is poor design
> implemented so when touching the code it is extended to worse because
I'm not sure I completely agree, there is obviously a lot going on with
bus->shutdown.
If you want to go ahead with your patch then please also rename the
class shutdown to shutdown_pre to make it clear it is doing something
different.
> it is smaller patch more likely to get past maintainers than fixing the
> mess.
Yes, this is probably true, the TPM fix needed to be back ported to -stable.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-10 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-09 21:34 [PATCH] Do not disable driver and bus shutdown hook when class shutdown hook is set Michal Suchanek
2017-08-09 21:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-08-10 10:18 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-08-10 16:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2017-08-11 5:04 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-08-11 15:28 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-08-11 17:01 ` Michal Suchánek
2017-08-11 11:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170810163057.GA21485@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).