From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] efi: call get_event_log before ExitBootServices Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:49:46 +0300 Message-ID: <20171016114946.phj3n6vyjdbpj2sj@linux.intel.com> References: <20170920081340.7413-5-tweek@google.com> <20170926114538.r5hsyc5osodpaals@linux.intel.com> <20170929171617.yq4dvn66czvnebns@linux.intel.com> <20171004105113.mcho3rlytaxfruyf@linux.intel.com> <20171010141419.e4uv4fkmcmpc7sdc@linux.intel.com> <20171011115254.2n4zs77ixyl2mdgm@linux.intel.com> <20171016112833.txbg2sm5tjocp6qh@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171016112833.txbg2sm5tjocp6qh@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Thiebaud Weksteen Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ard Biesheuvel , Matt Fleming , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , peterhuewe@gmx.de, Jason Gunthorpe , tpmdd@selhorst.net List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 02:28:33PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 02:52:54PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:54:26PM +1100, James Morris wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > > The way I've agreed with James Morris to have my tree is to be rooted to > > > > security trees next branch. > > > > > > > > James, what actions should we take? > > > > > > This process has changed recently -- I posted to lsm but forgot to post to > > > linux-integrity. > > > > > > http://kernsec.org/pipermail/linux-security-module-archive/2017-September/003356.html > > > > > > Summary: please track the next-general branch in my tree for your > > > development, it replaces 'next'. > > > > > > > > > - James > > > -- > > > James Morris > > > > > > > Ah I'm subscribed to that list but lately been busy getting a huge patch > > set to platform-driver-x86 [1] for review, which has prioritized out > > reading much else than linux-integrity. > > > > Thank you. I'll retry the patches tomorrow. > > > > /Jarkko > > Cannot observer binary_bios_measuremens file. > > What kind of hardware was used to develop/test this? > > I tried it with Kabylake and PTT (firmware TPM). > > /Jarkko My guess would be wrong event log format. At minimum this patch set should add a klog (info level) message to tell that unsupported event log format is being used. /Jarkko