From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Goldman Subject: Re: [Linux-ima-devel] New ML for TPM and IMA Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:08:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4bcddea8-3520-790a-a025-e8405c589fb8@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170915171825.5zjit5vsrvxgmvrb@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170915171825.5zjit5vsrvxgmvrb-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org To: Jarkko Sakkinen , tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net I also see email coming from linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TaiAVqoAR/hOA@public.gmane.org Should I also subscribe to that one? Is there another one for the TPM device driver? IMA? On 9/15/2017 1:18 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Hi > > Many people were kicked out from the SourceForge mailing list in the > July because SF required a resubscription, including non-human users, > such as patchwork. > > We decided to create a new mailing list linux-integrit-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > to cover both TPM and IMA since they tend to have cross dependencies. > Otherwise, the maintainer hierarchy etc. will stay the same. > > It is all documented here: > > http://kernsec.org/wiki/index.php/Linux_Kernel_Integrity > > From now on use this list for patches and discussion instead of the > legacy list. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot