From: Josh Zimmerman <joshz-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: Issue a TPM2_Shutdown for TPM2 devices.
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 17:24:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHSjozAhid2KXOrKJw8fQajThVhi0EONjr42S7wXpVwce-gmyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170515174053.GA6229-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Resending to all recipients...
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:33:04AM -0700, Josh Zimmerman wrote:
>> + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
>> + down_write(&chip->ops_sem);
>> + tpm2_shutdown(chip, TPM_SU_CLEAR);
>
> Would it be appropriate to now chain to the device_driver shutdown
> in case any TPM-bus related shutdown is required?
>
> We don't have any drivers that need that today though.
I think I'd prefer to keep the patch to the functionality we need
today. Is there any reason to prefer adding this functionality now
rather than waiting for a specific driver that needs it to add it when
it comes up?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-15 17:33 [PATCH v2] tpm: Issue a TPM2_Shutdown for TPM2 devices Josh Zimmerman
[not found] ` <20170515173304.12216-1-joshz-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-15 17:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20170515174053.GA6229-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-16 0:24 ` Josh Zimmerman [this message]
2017-05-20 12:44 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHSjozAhid2KXOrKJw8fQajThVhi0EONjr42S7wXpVwce-gmyw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=joshz-hpiqsd4aklfqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tpmdd-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).