u-boot.lists.denx.de archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device
@ 2022-07-15 15:15 Quentin Schulz
  2022-07-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths Quentin Schulz
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Schulz @ 2022-07-15 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: sjg, philipp.tomsich, kever.yang, alpernebiyasak, email2tema,
	u-boot, Quentin Schulz, Quentin Schulz

From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>

On RK3399, mmc0 is eMMC and mmc1 is SD card, c.f. console:
MMC:   mmc@fe320000: 1, mmc@fe330000: 0

In arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl-boot-order.c:board_boot_order, the
boot_device (BOOT_DEVICE_*) value is gotten from spl_node_to_boot_device
function. Said function returns BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1 for mmc0 (eMMC) and
BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2 for mmc1 (SD card).

Since the SD card controller is at mmc@fe320000, it should be associated
with BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2 and not BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1. Same applies to eMMC.

Let's fix that by swapping the two BOOT_DEVICEs.

Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
index 691d69dc59..f280cb1dbf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
@@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
 		u32 boot_device;
 		const char *ofpath;
 	} spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
-		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe320000" },
-		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe330000" },
+		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
+		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
 		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
 	};
 
-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths
  2022-07-15 15:15 [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device Quentin Schulz
@ 2022-07-15 15:15 ` Quentin Schulz
  2022-07-18 21:12   ` Xavier Drudis Ferran
  2022-08-27  3:59   ` Kever Yang
  2022-07-18 21:10 ` [SPAM] [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device Xavier Drudis Ferran
  2022-08-27  3:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot,spl-boot-device Kever Yang
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Schulz @ 2022-07-15 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: sjg, philipp.tomsich, kever.yang, alpernebiyasak, email2tema,
	u-boot, Quentin Schulz, Quentin Schulz

From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>

While technically not a bug, let's have some consistency in paths
returned by u-boot,spl-boot-order look-up and the one saved in
u-boot,spl-boot-device by syncing spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices
node paths.

Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
index f280cb1dbf..7147dc09f5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
 	} spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
 		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
 		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
-		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
+		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000/flash@0" },
 	};
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spl_boot_devices_tbl); ++i)
-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [SPAM] [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device
  2022-07-15 15:15 [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device Quentin Schulz
  2022-07-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths Quentin Schulz
@ 2022-07-18 21:10 ` Xavier Drudis Ferran
  2022-08-27  3:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot,spl-boot-device Kever Yang
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Xavier Drudis Ferran @ 2022-07-18 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Quentin Schulz
  Cc: sjg, philipp.tomsich, kever.yang, alpernebiyasak, email2tema,
	u-boot, Quentin Schulz

El Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:15:51PM +0200, Quentin Schulz deia:
> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> On RK3399, mmc0 is eMMC and mmc1 is SD card, c.f. console:
> MMC:   mmc@fe320000: 1, mmc@fe330000: 0
> 
> In arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl-boot-order.c:board_boot_order, the
> boot_device (BOOT_DEVICE_*) value is gotten from spl_node_to_boot_device
> function. Said function returns BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1 for mmc0 (eMMC) and
> BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2 for mmc1 (SD card).
> 
> Since the SD card controller is at mmc@fe320000, it should be associated
> with BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2 and not BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1. Same applies to eMMC.
> 
> Let's fix that by swapping the two BOOT_DEVICEs.
> 
> Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>

There's a thread here on what the proper naming would be
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2022-July/489155.html

I agree it's not been consistent, and I'd do it like in this patch,
but I don't feel strongly about any option nor pretend to stop any
discussion.

Tested on a Rock-Pi-4B and didn't see any regression.
Tested-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.cat>



> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> index 691d69dc59..f280cb1dbf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> @@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
>  		u32 boot_device;
>  		const char *ofpath;
>  	} spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
> -		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe320000" },
> -		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe330000" },
> +		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
> +		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
>  		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
>  	};
>  
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths
  2022-07-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths Quentin Schulz
@ 2022-07-18 21:12   ` Xavier Drudis Ferran
  2022-08-12 10:35     ` Quentin Schulz
  2022-08-27  3:59   ` Kever Yang
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Xavier Drudis Ferran @ 2022-07-18 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Quentin Schulz
  Cc: sjg, philipp.tomsich, kever.yang, alpernebiyasak, email2tema,
	u-boot, Quentin Schulz

El Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:15:52PM +0200, Quentin Schulz deia:
> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> While technically not a bug, let's have some consistency in paths
> returned by u-boot,spl-boot-order look-up and the one saved in
> u-boot,spl-boot-device by syncing spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices
> node paths.
> 
> Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
> ---


Tested on a Rock-Pi-4B and didn't see any regression.
Tested-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.cat>
Reviewed-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.cat>


>  arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> index f280cb1dbf..7147dc09f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
>  	} spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
>  		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
>  		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
> -		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
> +		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000/flash@0" },
>  	};
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spl_boot_devices_tbl); ++i)
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths
  2022-07-18 21:12   ` Xavier Drudis Ferran
@ 2022-08-12 10:35     ` Quentin Schulz
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Quentin Schulz @ 2022-08-12 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xavier Drudis Ferran, Quentin Schulz
  Cc: sjg, philipp.tomsich, kever.yang, alpernebiyasak, email2tema, u-boot

Hi all,

Gentle ping on the series.

Cheers,
Quentin

On 7/18/22 23:12, Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote:
> El Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:15:52PM +0200, Quentin Schulz deia:
>> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> While technically not a bug, let's have some consistency in paths
>> returned by u-boot,spl-boot-order look-up and the one saved in
>> u-boot,spl-boot-device by syncing spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices
>> node paths.
>>
>> Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
>> ---
> 
> 
> Tested on a Rock-Pi-4B and didn't see any regression.
> Tested-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.cat>
> Reviewed-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdrudis@tinet.cat>
> 
> 
>>   arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
>> index f280cb1dbf..7147dc09f5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
>> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
>>   	} spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
>>   		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
>>   		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
>> -		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
>> +		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000/flash@0" },
>>   	};
>>   
>>   	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spl_boot_devices_tbl); ++i)
>> -- 
>> 2.36.1
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot,spl-boot-device
  2022-07-15 15:15 [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device Quentin Schulz
  2022-07-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths Quentin Schulz
  2022-07-18 21:10 ` [SPAM] [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device Xavier Drudis Ferran
@ 2022-08-27  3:57 ` Kever Yang
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kever Yang @ 2022-08-27  3:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Quentin Schulz
  Cc: sjg, philipp.tomsich, alpernebiyasak, email2tema, u-boot, Quentin Schulz


On 2022/7/15 23:15, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
>
> On RK3399, mmc0 is eMMC and mmc1 is SD card, c.f. console:
> MMC:   mmc@fe320000: 1, mmc@fe330000: 0
>
> In arch/arm/mach-rockchip/spl-boot-order.c:board_boot_order, the
> boot_device (BOOT_DEVICE_*) value is gotten from spl_node_to_boot_device
> function. Said function returns BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1 for mmc0 (eMMC) and
> BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2 for mmc1 (SD card).
>
> Since the SD card controller is at mmc@fe320000, it should be associated
> with BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2 and not BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1. Same applies to eMMC.
>
> Let's fix that by swapping the two BOOT_DEVICEs.
>
> Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>

Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>

Thanks,
- Kever
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> index 691d69dc59..f280cb1dbf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> @@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
>   		u32 boot_device;
>   		const char *ofpath;
>   	} spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
> -		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe320000" },
> -		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe330000" },
> +		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
> +		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
>   		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
>   	};
>   

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths
  2022-07-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths Quentin Schulz
  2022-07-18 21:12   ` Xavier Drudis Ferran
@ 2022-08-27  3:59   ` Kever Yang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kever Yang @ 2022-08-27  3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Quentin Schulz
  Cc: sjg, philipp.tomsich, alpernebiyasak, email2tema, u-boot, Quentin Schulz


On 2022/7/15 23:15, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
>
> While technically not a bug, let's have some consistency in paths
> returned by u-boot,spl-boot-order look-up and the one saved in
> u-boot,spl-boot-device by syncing spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices
> node paths.
>
> Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>

Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>

Thanks,
- Kever
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> index f280cb1dbf..7147dc09f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
>   	} spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
>   		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
>   		{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
> -		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
> +		{ BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000/flash@0" },
>   	};
>   
>   	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spl_boot_devices_tbl); ++i)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-27  4:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-15 15:15 [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device Quentin Schulz
2022-07-15 15:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] rockchip: rk3399: sync spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices node paths Quentin Schulz
2022-07-18 21:12   ` Xavier Drudis Ferran
2022-08-12 10:35     ` Quentin Schulz
2022-08-27  3:59   ` Kever Yang
2022-07-18 21:10 ` [SPAM] [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot, spl-boot-device Xavier Drudis Ferran
2022-08-27  3:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] rockchip: rk3399: fix incorrect boot-device in u-boot,spl-boot-device Kever Yang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).