From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] block: fix blk_get_devnum_by_typename()
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 06:41:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPnjgZ2_j_w8XXok6PbAzVaSfJz3PUcLnP3C2QGa8Nk8tq95TQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220802094933.69170-1-heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Hi Heinrich,
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 03:50, Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Both the 'host' and the 'efiloader' block devices use the same parent
> uclass root. Thus the parent uclass is not an indicator the interface type.
>
> Currently the following fails:
>
> setenv efi_selftest block device
> bootefi selftest
> part list efiloader 0
>
> Struct blk_desc contains the interface type. So we can check it directly
> without caring about the parent uclass.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/blk-uclass.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
We've had this discussion before, but this patch will make it
difficult to migrate away from IF_TYPE.
Instead we should fix EFI. Having the root as a parent of a block
device seems wrong to me. What is the actual device that provides the
block device?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/blk-uclass.c b/drivers/block/blk-uclass.c
> index 21c5209bb6..779cda7834 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/blk-uclass.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/blk-uclass.c
> @@ -122,15 +122,11 @@ struct blk_desc *blk_get_devnum_by_typename(const char *if_typename, int devnum)
>
> debug("%s: if_type=%d, devnum=%d: %s, %d, %d\n", __func__,
> if_type, devnum, dev->name, desc->if_type, desc->devnum);
> - if (desc->devnum != devnum)
> - continue;
>
> - /* Find out the parent device uclass */
> - if (device_get_uclass_id(dev->parent) != uclass_id) {
> - debug("%s: parent uclass %d, this dev %d\n", __func__,
> - device_get_uclass_id(dev->parent), uclass_id);
> + if (desc->if_type != if_type)
> + continue;
> + if (desc->devnum != devnum)
> continue;
> - }
>
> if (device_probe(dev))
> return NULL;
> --
> 2.36.1
>
Regards,
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-02 9:49 [PATCH 1/1] block: fix blk_get_devnum_by_typename() Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-08-02 12:41 ` Simon Glass [this message]
2022-08-02 16:22 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-08-03 18:14 ` Simon Glass
2022-08-04 6:06 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2022-08-07 15:48 ` Simon Glass
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPnjgZ2_j_w8XXok6PbAzVaSfJz3PUcLnP3C2QGa8Nk8tq95TQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).