From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB15C433EF for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B518342C; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:38:59 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="LZuNPQsN"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id CA3778314C; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:37:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ua1-x92d.google.com (mail-ua1-x92d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D1583457 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 17:37:36 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sjg@google.com Received: by mail-ua1-x92d.google.com with SMTP id 107so5367127uaj.10 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:37:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jJWxUnxoTDM0LaPhAdB8e/cOQahl6xEEQ2G4ZE5lTXs=; b=LZuNPQsNdhb9bII7dvHcwyTkLQdSwfNJHnX3ns2cj4jWKaYh3OybT/Hj/11TCOFaYT BtzH/hj+ShGC+635geCGo2F0vjXjWPQsP970/yG48NMcMkNLi1HHOAVIrL9yY35icMN6 nNGhdVyDPsh16dC7PvFjPOV4N+EpEZKxJmq+A= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jJWxUnxoTDM0LaPhAdB8e/cOQahl6xEEQ2G4ZE5lTXs=; b=Kx5RlrdLIMZisPwzW652h8sAUYTyWti1Pow4thS2VpVU3fHhlEoWRTnk6+iNYOAz9M sCmvOaN+QJMRk6Ks/1Gybp3hIJXlav73J4pAdSPk2q1WYtl6FSdQzFOSPJrkxGZTsh5l GdGmXpMLdpoHdeacIgAWMUx9tJCvjAkO+PCJ9gkAOSxQjD0XZ4DWnPJDMlfnLL6yRy0U fTkdsOkZ5z3SKGraK2GSui0x3niRpje2x9oEfI+UZb54fwswabKmKNkndhqvQNZRXe9U eH/n96tH+Nj5qkzi861g2ZHcRaG5RiWalBxQsWlGRBRli8+usynPedPUBQVvPV3VIW2Z R4bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306tlGDT9Nb8oGLWCGnzmMbwGfymifSvuAdpKY1XnPbiIgdnx5b NE0jAANmaBPIQwFpnSxqyRdt2ejEnA9ojQS+TQ+UcA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzirWezIeO4z/2mmusBixPBPaSzxfE+z3rtie7JovrksjyP7kIi2GGZICGamMH1l5/ueyz7nxFl00qxEbnTPOc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:c86:: with SMTP id f6mr1630099vst.38.1639759055308; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:37:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211204155657.2913911-1-sjg@chromium.org> <20211204085647.v5.22.I06df84f267228992662b3897e92747937e6b317a@changeid> In-Reply-To: From: Simon Glass Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:37:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 22/28] x86: efi: Show the system-table revision To: Heinrich Schuchardt Cc: U-Boot Mailing List , Ilias Apalodimas , Christian Melki , Bin Meng , Tom Rini , Alexander Graf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.38 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Heinrich, On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 13:34, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On 12/4/21 07:56, Simon Glass wrote: > > Show the revision of this table as it can be important. > > > > Alo update the 'efi table' entry to show the actual address of the EFI > > %s/Alo/Also/ > > > table rather than our table that points to it. This saves a step and the > > intermediate table has nothing else in it. > > Should this information been shown by the 'efi' command instead of 'bdinfo'? Perhaps we should add an 'efi info' command for this and various other things. We could show a lot more info. But as you know, I like to have EFI more integrated into U-Boot and the bdinfo command is used for all sorts of subsystems. It is a natural place for people to look for the basics. Regards, Simon