From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: wild@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] lsmem: fix total online/offline memory calculation
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:17:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180320161738.49439-1-gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> (raw)
lsmem currently calculates the total online/offline memory by iterating
over all lsmem->blocks. Depending on the lsmem options, there may be
only one lsmem->block, because all sysfs memory blocks could be merged
into one. In this case, the calculation is wrong, because the individual
online/offline state of the sysfs memory blocks is not preserved, but
rather lsmem->blocks[0].state is set to the state of the first sysfs
memory block, typically MEMORY_STATE_ONLINE (at least on s390).
This means that "Total offline memory" will always be calculated as 0
in such cases, e.g. when using "lsmem --summary", or any options that
would merge the table output to one line, like "lsmem -o RANGE":
~# lsmem --summary
Memory block size: 1G
Total online memory: 20G
Total offline memory: 0B
Adding the "-a" option shows the real summary, since there is no block
merging going on, and the calculation is therefore correct:
~# lsmem -a --summary
Memory block size: 1G
Total online memory: 16G
Total offline memory: 4G
Fix this by moving the online/offline calculation into the loop that
is iterating over all sysfs memory blocks, instead of iterating over
potentially merged lsmem->blocks.
Reported-by: Andre Wild <wild@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
---
sys-utils/lsmem.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sys-utils/lsmem.c b/sys-utils/lsmem.c
index 3e06e43be74e..517207431c83 100644
--- a/sys-utils/lsmem.c
+++ b/sys-utils/lsmem.c
@@ -443,6 +443,10 @@ static void read_info(struct lsmem *lsmem)
for (i = 0; i < lsmem->ndirs; i++) {
memory_block_read_attrs(lsmem, lsmem->dirs[i]->d_name, &blk);
+ if (blk.state == MEMORY_STATE_ONLINE)
+ lsmem->mem_online += lsmem->block_size;
+ else
+ lsmem->mem_offline += lsmem->block_size;
if (is_mergeable(lsmem, &blk)) {
lsmem->blocks[lsmem->nblocks - 1].count++;
continue;
@@ -451,12 +455,6 @@ static void read_info(struct lsmem *lsmem)
lsmem->blocks = xrealloc(lsmem->blocks, lsmem->nblocks * sizeof(blk));
*&lsmem->blocks[lsmem->nblocks - 1] = blk;
}
- for (i = 0; i < lsmem->nblocks; i++) {
- if (lsmem->blocks[i].state == MEMORY_STATE_ONLINE)
- lsmem->mem_online += lsmem->block_size * lsmem->blocks[i].count;
- else
- lsmem->mem_offline += lsmem->block_size * lsmem->blocks[i].count;
- }
}
static int memory_block_filter(const struct dirent *de)
--
2.13.5
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-20 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-20 16:17 Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2018-03-20 17:47 ` [PATCH] lsmem: fix total online/offline memory calculation Gerald Schaefer
2018-03-20 17:57 ` Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180320161738.49439-1-gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wild@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).