From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:55632 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728055AbeHMMn0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:43:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 12:01:48 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-opages)" , Jan Kara , Steve Kenton , util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Update mount options for UDF Message-ID: <20180813100148.km4stli2heqx6txv@ws.net.home> References: <20180227184407.5945-1-skenton@ou.edu> <20180228130828.j3wbez6pzzzeknuc@ws.net.home> <20180228133220.3rmkcqnk6giry4bk@quack2.suse.cz> <20180228220319.ccosidfzrdlowwqu@pali> <20180506111527.xfzvxf2d4chajgyt@pali> <20180808135258.ttcw5bmesiwuihvr@pali> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <20180808135258.ttcw5bmesiwuihvr@pali> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 03:52:58PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Sunday 06 May 2018 13:15:27 Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Sunday 06 May 2018 12:35:02 Michael Kerrisk (man-opages) wrote: > > > On 02/28/2018 11:03 PM, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 28 February 2018 14:32:20 Jan Kara wrote: > > > > > On Wed 28-02-18 14:08:28, Karel Zak wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:44:07PM -0600, Steve Kenton wrote: > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Steve Kenton > > > > > > > Acked-by: Jan Kara > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > sys-utils/mount.8 | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan, what about to create udf(5) man page? We already have fs-specific > > > > > > man pages (e.g. ext4, tmpfs, nfs, btrfs, ...). It's usually maintained > > > > > > within fs-specific tools (e.g. ext4 -> e2fsprogs) or together with > > > > > > standard man-pages (CC: to Michael). > > > > > > > > > > I'm fine with that. Pali is actually the maintainer of udf-tools so if he > > > > > is willing to take the manpage there, it's probably the best place. > > > > > > > > Is udftools the best place for kernel udf mount options? Because > > > > userspace udftools are not needed for kernel udf driver, nor for > > > > mounting existing udf filesystem. > > > > > > > > For me it looks like that kernel drivers should have its documentation > > > > in kernel itself... > > > > > > [way late to the party...] > > > > > > Or, better, in a man page that describes the kernel interface :-). > > > Many other filesystems have by now Section 5 pages in the man-pages package > > > that I maintain. A udf(5) page that describes the mount options that the > > > kernel supports for UDF would be best, and I think best lives inside > > > "man-pages" because it is kernel interface stuff. > > > > Ok, that sounds good. > > > > > Or, did such a page already land in udf-tools? > > > > No, there is no such manpage. > > Karel, Michael, has something happened here? I have thought that the ball is on UDF playground :-) If you create udf.5 (for man-pages or udf-tools) than I'll remove udf stuff from the mount.8 man page. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com