From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_HK_NAME_DR, USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3CAC43381 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8632087C for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=treblig.org header.i=@treblig.org header.b="nGGn0Ors" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727027AbfCKWBP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:01:15 -0400 Received: from mx.treblig.org ([46.43.15.161]:56672 "EHLO mx.treblig.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727008AbfCKWBP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:01:15 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2408 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:01:14 EDT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=treblig.org ; s=bytemarkmx; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID :Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=otsW0qtatXfpzL5xTzVv4JQxi+EEfSuWTtLO9uUmQPw=; b=nGGn0OrsQyco1KVDdD55Py7Uyj EB61GD8ucEJqi/vuspu0nEA27zUepJF4kMLfufiOBO79TrfLGzkoj+GwRQ4r/Ip3FMLTLrZvqtA/0 q1SG+yF6HvhGJGW3oseuXtf7rsv1/988aqquYwMCK/nUtPv6vlKvfo1HqUPxNL9t0ws6Kq++qYg55 PaQSrto3rBKg2lCLFqMwCuweosAQp2pMus8zOzheSfzjbfiLTZbk0sVcG6QtyPMx1nYp8AxtvxvyU ZN8iVZFUeRA/wSOfwnXrMtItRTNlOnsZSOIqp0ZUamJR0oCfsXf4Plwc/+3WSQ/BQ2tGPZcvp65ua v3UWD5FA==; Received: from dg by mx.treblig.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h3SM5-0007yg-2l; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:21:05 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:21:04 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: L A Walsh Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: does util-linux have a 'report sector size' util? Message-ID: <20190311212104.edekhgctqto37tn7@gallifrey> References: <5C86CBA1.40802@tlinx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5C86CBA1.40802@tlinx.org> X-Chocolate: 70 percent or better cocoa solids preferably X-Operating-System: Linux/4.9.0-6-amd64 (x86_64) X-Uptime: 21:20:16 up 217 days, 2:19, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.03, 0.00 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: util-linux@vger.kernel.org * L A Walsh (lkml@tlinx.org) wrote: > > Trying to track down why my 4K drives no longer display 4K > in sysfs (/sys) and don't seem to show individual disk > drive information. When I first got the drives, linux displayed > the correct physical disk size, but when I look now, I only > see 512. > > I just checked with MegaCLI, and it can still display all > the data (harddisk manuf. in each bah, and physical sector size). > > So I'm wonder if util-linux has something in its blk library > about this? Is this one of the PHY-SEC or LOG-SEC fields that lsblk can print? [dg@major ~]$ lsblk -o "NAME,PHY-SEC,LOG-SEC" NAME PHY-SEC LOG-SEC sda 512 512 Dave > -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/