From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86941C31E44 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F57B2084E for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725825AbfFNHsd (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:48:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34460 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725812AbfFNHsc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 03:48:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D1F308624B; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ws.net.home (unknown [10.40.205.47]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C5761001E60; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 09:48:28 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: "Jakowski, Andrzej" Cc: "util-linux@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC] utility for SED management Message-ID: <20190614074828.iqgomebc6gilprkn@ws.net.home> References: <548EA37F71F6AC4BB746F459732504FF7F1810E3@FMSMSX119.amr.corp.intel.com> <20190612134005.cb7m2qhgf2aolrf6@ws.net.home> <548EA37F71F6AC4BB746F459732504FF7F184907@FMSMSX119.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <548EA37F71F6AC4BB746F459732504FF7F184907@FMSMSX119.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-1584-710bcd X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.49]); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: util-linux@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:51:12PM +0000, Jakowski, Andrzej wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 01:40:08PM +0000, Karel Zak wrote: > > From my point of view (and maybe I'm wrong ;-)) it seems complex enough to keep it as an independent stand-alone project ("sed-utils"). > > Not sure if it makes sense to push it to generic util-linux package. > > It sounds to me that your major concern for inclusion sedcli into util-linux is > its complexity. What would be the best method to understand if sedcli fits into > util-linux? Do you have the current code/repo with sedcli accessible anywhere? It would be nice to see it. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com