From: Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Consistency fixes in util-linux man pages
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 19:23:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519172337.GA23268@Debian-50-lenny-64-minimal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200519103832.7kmxmta2dl67ujpj@ws.net.home>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2546 bytes --]
Hello Karel,
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:38:32PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:03:13PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:36:01PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > > I'm not too knowledgeable in AsciiDc, but my impression is that it's
> > > too limited in terms of its formatting opinions.
>
> Yes, I'm not sure about AsciiDoc limitations. For example systemd guys uses
> DocBook which is probably ultimate solution.
I'm currently translating them. Also I've used DocBook myself to write
manges (a long time ago).
> > > If I did move man-pages, the most likely candidate would probably be
> > > Sphinx, as is nowadays used in the kernel docs. But, that would
> > > require converting a thousand pages or so, and I have not so far had
> > > the stomach for that. Of course, you have a rather smaller set of
> > > pages to deal with, so a conversion step sould be more easily
> > > entertained.
> >
> > Even though man pages are limitted in formatting, they are universally
> > available and, from our POV, getting more attention from the
> > translators side. We just welcomed our seventh language. Probably not
> > relevant for kenel side docs, but for programs by non programmers (and
> > presumably non native speakers) man pages are good option.
>
> The idea is maintain documentation (in git tree) in some content
> oriented language and then generate man pages from this content. It
> means in the official release tarball will be man pages and end-users
> will not see any difference.
Ok, then this is fine.
> The issue I have with man pages is that contributor very often send
> patches to change formatting details and keep it consistent, avoid
> color-of-bike-shed discussions is very difficult. It would be better
> care about content and keep all the formatting details in some
> conversion template.
I strongly agree. Keep content and presentation separate. This also
helps us translators, even though we don't see the original markup, we
do quickly understand the results, because it is consistent, i.e. what
to translate and what to leave untranslated (e.g. command names vs.
variable names)
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann debian@helgefjell.de
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-16 8:24 Consistency fixes in util-linux man pages Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-05-18 8:28 ` Karel Zak
2020-05-18 10:36 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2020-05-18 15:03 ` Helge Kreutzmann
2020-05-19 10:38 ` Karel Zak
2020-05-19 17:23 ` Helge Kreutzmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200519172337.GA23268@Debian-50-lenny-64-minimal \
--to=debian@helgefjell.de \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).