From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD52C433E4 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C039D222D9 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="EFlbjGxh" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728413AbgGNMO3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:14:29 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:35593 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728376AbgGNMO2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:14:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594728867; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yadKsB4SSF7HSgxcaPWbTVqqau0J+BrR21l5zLUe5eU=; b=EFlbjGxhDEKBKo6rLOTKoqpNCYSWcyBvJzq4LvH6txKgTv5wpK3M1CKElUEoqpXBV1jxB0 7JWtSKCohWBfQTmrCYMA2R+VE0fFk0NmniU9psCxq4IpWj9bNBisFF0d/3LdKC1Ghv2rFM sqYKEPF9Yt9rS3oerou2DKGc6xzFM3I= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-510-hGhhxiXbMJK8r2B4PLJCXQ-1; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:14:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: hGhhxiXbMJK8r2B4PLJCXQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9620080BCA8; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ws.net.home (unknown [10.40.194.98]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D53F479CE3; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:14:20 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Manual pages: various: reword "allow(s) to" Message-ID: <20200714121420.fvmuuasgkq5hrtcz@ws.net.home> References: <20200714095741.45292-1-mtk.manpages@gmail.com> <20200714095741.45292-5-mtk.manpages@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200714095741.45292-5-mtk.manpages@gmail.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: util-linux@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:57:41AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > The wording "allow(s) to" is not grammatical English. Reword various > pages to use a more correct form such "can be use to" or "allows > the [noun] of". > > Aklong the way, fix a few nearby wording errors in some pages. Some of the "allow to" has been already fixed by Bjarni Ingi Gislason (well, his fix is "allows ing" -- not sure what is better ;-). The rest has been merged without change. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com