From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from nautica.notk.org (nautica.notk.org [91.121.71.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 515849479 for ; Tue, 2 May 2023 23:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id 7A45AC021; Wed, 3 May 2023 01:33:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1683070391; bh=DCCDMXns57nPsLdJGb9E6WpE+yDkCf8eWVUNtOrwEJs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fElTX+cfICmZL/Fu+WBThks+fQBSCYqochAQKPK3NFK2PEcYAp64RlVcgHOswe7Ad FeLCZ5ezU6FqXoBLBr37O5mnEhy3HJmFjIb/Hs2pXeopC1IgSxV5LFVRY57YXIhEFr dOnUf8uF+V/OgDqIcQLPT7bfg4PbRSZUxIM/Hp4BczNij0VK28QB9Ry5t0XNGhENOT nkspQCmnyMddo99E0cc5YEXQwndjTbsjoXA4G+lRE8kEowC4ENl3OGFdemaYBp47m4 0CGH73YIdSiDoOz7GYfDIl6DhfhQUhAdQBX4r1hqY8t610tHQHryBXBuO1noOl2nGX /4kj1J4j5SX0w== X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on nautica.notk.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from odin.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DACFC009; Wed, 3 May 2023 01:33:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1683070390; bh=DCCDMXns57nPsLdJGb9E6WpE+yDkCf8eWVUNtOrwEJs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gtQ3nlWPVXFopl3E1YZUCIWANx5teA4UF9pzxP7h1tdN/ZfjKGtb9QMHX1t2LtAfI 9OHKoimKjVXbx1cTMLcRLGhh9UY7Uk4f3RTt3/t1z+6PKH9l5R95zp6rVdeH66jilk KQw1jrFOSj6TnYxiBqetin31Rlg+uA8VeG8e6jFFd3RMkZ11pU8cNAJ8+xT4lD3ewb DcAOeYNdMdlqd3lnjo23oxG33adB0IETWclFyIr6ZRdE0qiom2KG4hMX5ARklmopHR iu+T6SB1r0qoZF28eB2VaK9MmeZvyHwHZxDoTWSGtrYE8Mndre1XE/zQl4Y+ZM4Uz8 wuYfVtWC9TgKA== Received: from localhost (odin.codewreck.org [local]) by odin.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 08906240; Tue, 2 May 2023 23:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 08:32:49 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Simon Horman Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Christian Schoenebeck , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] 9p: fix ignored return value in v9fs_dir_release Message-ID: References: <20230427-scan-build-v1-0-efa05d65e2da@codewreck.org> <20230427-scan-build-v1-1-efa05d65e2da@codewreck.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: v9fs@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Thanks for all the reviews! Simon Horman wrote on Tue, May 02, 2023 at 04:46:17PM +0200: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 08:23:34PM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > > retval from filemap_fdatawrite was immediately overwritten by the > > following p9_fid_put: preserve any error in fdatawrite if there > > was any first. > > > > This fixes the following scan-build warning: > > fs/9p/vfs_dir.c:220:4: warning: Value stored to 'retval' is never read [deadcode.DeadStores] > > retval = filemap_fdatawrite(inode->i_mapping); > > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Perhaps: > > Fixes: 89c58cb395ec ("fs/9p: fix error reporting in v9fs_dir_release") Right, this one warrants a fix tag as it's the only real bug in this series. I'll add the Fixes and fix the typo in patch 5 and send a v2 later today. -- Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus