From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: [PATCH v3 13/19] include/linux: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comments Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:51:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20200710165203.31284-14-will@kernel.org> References: <20200710165203.31284-1-will@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200710165203.31284-1-will@kernel.org> Sender: linux-alpha-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Will Deacon , Joel Fernandes , Sami Tolvanen , Nick Desaulniers , Kees Cook , Marco Elver , "Paul E. McKenney" , Matt Turner , Ivan Kokshaysky , Richard Henderson , Peter Zijlstra , Alan Stern , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Arnd Bergmann , Boqun Feng , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, virtualizati List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org smp_read_barrier_depends() doesn't exist any more, so reword the two comments that mention it to refer to "dependency ordering" instead. Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- include/linux/percpu-refcount.h | 2 +- include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h index 22d9d183950d..87d8a38bdea1 100644 --- a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h +++ b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static inline bool __ref_is_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref, * between contaminating the pointer value, meaning that * READ_ONCE() is required when fetching it. * - * The smp_read_barrier_depends() implied by READ_ONCE() pairs + * The dependency ordering from the READ_ONCE() pairs * with smp_store_release() in __percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(). */ percpu_ptr = READ_ONCE(ref->percpu_count_ptr); diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h index 417db0a79a62..808f9d3ee546 100644 --- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h +++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static inline int __ptr_ring_produce(struct ptr_ring *r, void *ptr) return -ENOSPC; /* Make sure the pointer we are storing points to a valid data. */ - /* Pairs with smp_read_barrier_depends in __ptr_ring_consume. */ + /* Pairs with the dependency ordering in __ptr_ring_consume. */ smp_wmb(); WRITE_ONCE(r->queue[r->producer++], ptr); -- 2.27.0.383.g050319c2ae-goog