From: "Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Adalbert Lazăr" <alazar@bitdefender.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 53/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:08:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200721210922.7646-54-alazar@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200721210922.7646-1-alazar@bitdefender.com>
This event is sent by the vCPU thread as a response to the KVMI_VCPU_PAUSE
command, but it has a lower priority, being sent after any other
introspection event and when no other introspection command is queued.
The number of KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU will match the number of successful
KVMI_VCPU_PAUSE commands.
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Lazăr <alazar@bitdefender.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst | 22 ++-
arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c | 81 +++++++++
include/linux/kvmi_host.h | 11 ++
include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h | 13 ++
.../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c | 46 ++++++
virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c | 24 ++-
virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h | 3 +
virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++-
8 files changed, 351 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
index 502ee06d5e77..06c1cb34209e 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst
@@ -563,6 +563,25 @@ On x86 the structure looks like this::
It contains information about the vCPU state at the time of the event.
+An event reply begins with two common structures::
+
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
+ struct kvmi_event_reply {
+ __u8 action;
+ __u8 event;
+ __u16 padding1;
+ __u32 padding2;
+ };
+
+All events accept the KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CRASH action, which stops the
+guest ungracefully, but as soon as possible.
+
+Most of the events accept the KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE action, which
+lets the instruction that caused the event to continue.
+
+Some of the events accept the KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_RETRY action, to continue
+by re-entering in guest.
+
Specific event data can follow these common structures.
1. KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK
@@ -604,7 +623,8 @@ operation can proceed).
struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr;
struct kvmi_event_reply;
-This event is sent in response to a *KVMI_VCPU_PAUSE* command.
+This event is sent in response to a *KVMI_VCPU_PAUSE* command and
+cannot be controlled with *KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS*.
Because it has a low priority, it will be sent after any other vCPU
introspection event and when no other vCPU introspection command is
queued.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
index cf7bfff6c8c5..ce7e2d5f2ab4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/kvmi.c
@@ -5,8 +5,89 @@
* Copyright (C) 2019-2020 Bitdefender S.R.L.
*/
+#include "linux/kvm_host.h"
+#include "x86.h"
#include "../../../virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h"
+static unsigned int kvmi_vcpu_mode(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
+{
+ unsigned int mode = 0;
+
+ if (is_long_mode((struct kvm_vcpu *) vcpu)) {
+ if (sregs->cs.l)
+ mode = 8;
+ else if (!sregs->cs.db)
+ mode = 2;
+ else
+ mode = 4;
+ } else if (sregs->cr0 & X86_CR0_PE) {
+ if (!sregs->cs.db)
+ mode = 2;
+ else
+ mode = 4;
+ } else if (!sregs->cs.db) {
+ mode = 2;
+ } else {
+ mode = 4;
+ }
+
+ return mode;
+}
+
+static void kvmi_get_msrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvmi_event_arch *event)
+{
+ struct msr_data msr;
+
+ msr.host_initiated = true;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.sysenter_cs = msr.data;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.sysenter_esp = msr.data;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.sysenter_eip = msr.data;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_EFER;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.efer = msr.data;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_STAR;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.star = msr.data;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_LSTAR;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.lstar = msr.data;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_CSTAR;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.cstar = msr.data;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_IA32_CR_PAT;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.pat = msr.data;
+
+ msr.index = MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE;
+ kvm_x86_ops.get_msr(vcpu, &msr);
+ event->msrs.shadow_gs = msr.data;
+}
+
+void kvmi_arch_setup_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvmi_event *ev)
+{
+ struct kvmi_event_arch *event = &ev->arch;
+
+ kvm_arch_vcpu_get_regs(vcpu, &event->regs);
+ kvm_arch_vcpu_get_sregs(vcpu, &event->sregs);
+ ev->arch.mode = kvmi_vcpu_mode(vcpu, &event->sregs);
+ kvmi_get_msrs(vcpu, event);
+}
+
int kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_get_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvmi_vcpu_get_info_reply *rpl)
{
diff --git a/include/linux/kvmi_host.h b/include/linux/kvmi_host.h
index fdb8ce6fe6a5..a87f0322c584 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvmi_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvmi_host.h
@@ -6,6 +6,14 @@
#include <asm/kvmi_host.h>
+struct kvmi_vcpu_reply {
+ int error;
+ int action;
+ u32 seq;
+ void *data;
+ size_t size;
+};
+
struct kvmi_job {
struct list_head link;
void *ctx;
@@ -20,6 +28,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_introspection {
spinlock_t job_lock;
atomic_t pause_requests;
+
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_reply reply;
+ bool waiting_for_reply;
};
struct kvm_introspection {
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
index 3ded22020bef..5a5b01df7e3e 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvmi.h
@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ enum {
KVMI_NUM_EVENTS
};
+enum {
+ KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE = 0,
+ KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_RETRY = 1,
+ KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CRASH = 2,
+};
+
struct kvmi_msg_hdr {
__u16 id;
__u16 size;
@@ -124,4 +130,11 @@ struct kvmi_event {
struct kvmi_event_arch arch;
};
+struct kvmi_event_reply {
+ __u8 action;
+ __u8 event;
+ __u16 padding1;
+ __u32 padding2;
+};
+
#endif /* _UAPI__LINUX_KVMI_H */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
index 0df890b4b440..5c5c5018832d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/kvmi_test.c
@@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ static vm_paddr_t test_gpa;
static uint8_t test_write_pattern;
static int page_size;
+struct vcpu_reply {
+ struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr vcpu_hdr;
+ struct kvmi_event_reply reply;
+};
+
struct vcpu_worker_data {
struct kvm_vm *vm;
int vcpu_id;
@@ -772,14 +778,54 @@ static void pause_vcpu(void)
cmd_vcpu_pause(1, 0, 0);
}
+static void reply_to_event(struct kvmi_msg_hdr *ev_hdr, struct kvmi_event *ev,
+ __u8 action, struct vcpu_reply *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+ ssize_t r;
+
+ rpl->hdr.id = ev_hdr->id;
+ rpl->hdr.seq = ev_hdr->seq;
+ rpl->hdr.size = rpl_size - sizeof(rpl->hdr);
+
+ rpl->vcpu_hdr.vcpu = ev->vcpu;
+
+ rpl->reply.action = action;
+ rpl->reply.event = ev->event;
+
+ r = send(Userspace_socket, rpl, rpl_size, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == rpl_size,
+ "send() failed, sending %zd, result %zd, errno %d (%s)\n",
+ rpl_size, r, errno, strerror(errno));
+}
+
+static void discard_pause_event(struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+ struct vcpu_worker_data data = {.vm = vm, .vcpu_id = VCPU_ID};
+ struct vcpu_reply rpl = {};
+ struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+ pthread_t vcpu_thread;
+ struct kvmi_event ev;
+
+ vcpu_thread = start_vcpu_worker(&data);
+
+ receive_event(&hdr, &ev, sizeof(ev), KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU);
+
+ reply_to_event(&hdr, &ev, KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE,
+ &rpl, sizeof(rpl));
+
+ stop_vcpu_worker(vcpu_thread, &data);
+}
+
static void test_pause(struct kvm_vm *vm)
{
__u8 no_wait = 0, wait = 1, wait_inval = 2;
__u8 padding = 1, no_padding = 0;
pause_vcpu();
+ discard_pause_event(vm);
cmd_vcpu_pause(wait, no_padding, 0);
+ discard_pause_event(vm);
cmd_vcpu_pause(wait_inval, no_padding, -KVM_EINVAL);
cmd_vcpu_pause(no_wait, padding, -KVM_EINVAL);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
index a704e05b3184..02a866ca8d8c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi.c
@@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ static void kvmi_job_release_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void *ctx)
struct kvm_vcpu_introspection *vcpui = VCPUI(vcpu);
atomic_set(&vcpui->pause_requests, 0);
+ vcpui->waiting_for_reply = false;
}
static void kvmi_release_vcpus(struct kvm *kvm)
@@ -743,12 +744,33 @@ void kvmi_run_jobs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
}
+static void kvmi_handle_unsupported_event_action(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ kvmi_sock_shutdown(KVMI(kvm));
+}
+
+void kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(struct kvm *kvm, u32 action)
+{
+ switch (action) {
+ default:
+ kvmi_handle_unsupported_event_action(kvm);
+ }
+}
+
static void kvmi_vcpu_pause_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_vcpu_introspection *vcpui = VCPUI(vcpu);
+ u32 action;
atomic_dec(&vcpui->pause_requests);
- /* to be implemented */
+
+ action = kvmi_msg_send_vcpu_pause(vcpu);
+ switch (action) {
+ case KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE:
+ break;
+ default:
+ kvmi_handle_common_event_actions(vcpu->kvm, action);
+ }
}
void kvmi_handle_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
index cb99cb3db396..f73596032883 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_int.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ void kvmi_sock_shutdown(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
void kvmi_sock_put(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
bool kvmi_msg_process(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
int kvmi_msg_send_unhook(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi);
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_vcpu_pause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
/* kvmi.c */
void *kvmi_msg_alloc(void);
@@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ bool kvmi_is_known_vm_event(u8 id);
int kvmi_add_job(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
void (*fct)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void *ctx),
void *ctx, void (*free_fct)(void *ctx));
+void kvmi_run_jobs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int kvmi_cmd_vm_control_events(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
unsigned int event_id, bool enable);
int kvmi_cmd_read_physical(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gpa, size_t size,
@@ -51,5 +53,6 @@ int kvmi_cmd_vcpu_pause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool wait);
/* arch */
int kvmi_arch_cmd_vcpu_get_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvmi_vcpu_get_info_reply *rpl);
+void kvmi_arch_setup_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvmi_event *ev);
#endif
diff --git a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
index 1adec838cddd..1dcd3db75ff1 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/introspection/kvmi_msg.c
@@ -337,6 +337,66 @@ static int handle_vcpu_get_info(const struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job *job,
return kvmi_msg_vcpu_reply(job, msg, 0, &rpl, sizeof(rpl));
}
+static int check_event_reply(const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+ const struct kvmi_event_reply *reply,
+ const struct kvmi_vcpu_reply *expected,
+ u8 *action, size_t *received)
+{
+ size_t msg_size, common, event_size;
+ int err = -EINVAL;
+
+ if (unlikely(msg->seq != expected->seq))
+ return err;
+
+ msg_size = msg->size;
+ common = sizeof(struct kvmi_vcpu_hdr) + sizeof(*reply);
+
+ if (check_sub_overflow(msg_size, common, &event_size))
+ return err;
+
+ if (unlikely(event_size > expected->size))
+ return err;
+
+ if (unlikely(reply->padding1 || reply->padding2))
+ return err;
+
+ *received = event_size;
+ *action = reply->action;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int handle_vcpu_event_reply(const struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job *job,
+ const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *msg,
+ const void *rpl)
+{
+ struct kvm_vcpu_introspection *vcpui = VCPUI(job->vcpu);
+ struct kvmi_vcpu_reply *expected = &vcpui->reply;
+ const struct kvmi_event_reply *reply = rpl;
+ const void *reply_data = reply + 1;
+ size_t useful, received;
+ u8 action;
+
+ expected->error = check_event_reply(msg, reply, expected, &action,
+ &received);
+ if (unlikely(expected->error))
+ goto out;
+
+ useful = min(received, expected->size);
+ if (useful)
+ memcpy(expected->data, reply_data, useful);
+
+ if (expected->size > useful)
+ memset((char *)expected->data + useful, 0,
+ expected->size - useful);
+
+ expected->action = action;
+ expected->error = 0;
+
+out:
+ vcpui->waiting_for_reply = false;
+ return expected->error;
+}
+
/*
* These functions are executed from the vCPU thread. The receiving thread
* passes the messages using a newly allocated 'struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job'
@@ -345,6 +405,7 @@ static int handle_vcpu_get_info(const struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job *job,
*/
static int(*const msg_vcpu[])(const struct kvmi_vcpu_msg_job *,
const struct kvmi_msg_hdr *, const void *) = {
+ [KVMI_EVENT] = handle_vcpu_event_reply,
[KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO] = handle_vcpu_get_info,
};
@@ -430,7 +491,7 @@ static int kvmi_msg_do_vm_cmd(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
static bool is_message_allowed(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi, u16 id)
{
- return kvmi_is_command_allowed(kvmi, id);
+ return id == KVMI_EVENT || kvmi_is_command_allowed(kvmi, id);
}
static int kvmi_msg_vm_reply_ec(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
@@ -450,7 +511,8 @@ static int kvmi_msg_handle_vm_cmd(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
static bool vcpu_can_handle_messages(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return vcpu->arch.mp_state != KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED;
+ return VCPUI(vcpu)->waiting_for_reply
+ || vcpu->arch.mp_state != KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED;
}
static int kvmi_get_vcpu_if_ready(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi,
@@ -554,6 +616,13 @@ static void kvmi_setup_event_common(struct kvmi_event *ev, u32 ev_id,
ev->size = sizeof(*ev);
}
+static void kvmi_setup_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvmi_event *ev,
+ u32 ev_id)
+{
+ kvmi_setup_event_common(ev, ev_id, kvm_vcpu_get_idx(vcpu));
+ kvmi_arch_setup_event(vcpu, ev);
+}
+
int kvmi_msg_send_unhook(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
{
struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
@@ -570,3 +639,85 @@ int kvmi_msg_send_unhook(struct kvm_introspection *kvmi)
return kvmi_sock_write(kvmi, vec, n, msg_size);
}
+
+static int kvmi_wait_for_reply(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct rcuwait *waitp = kvm_arch_vcpu_get_wait(vcpu);
+ struct kvm_vcpu_introspection *vcpui = VCPUI(vcpu);
+ int err = 0;
+
+ while (vcpui->waiting_for_reply && !err) {
+ kvmi_run_jobs(vcpu);
+
+ err = rcuwait_wait_event(waitp,
+ !vcpui->waiting_for_reply ||
+ !list_empty(&vcpui->job_list),
+ TASK_KILLABLE);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static void kvmi_setup_vcpu_reply(struct kvm_vcpu_introspection *vcpui,
+ u32 event_seq, void *rpl, size_t rpl_size)
+{
+ memset(&vcpui->reply, 0, sizeof(vcpui->reply));
+
+ vcpui->reply.seq = event_seq;
+ vcpui->reply.data = rpl;
+ vcpui->reply.size = rpl_size;
+ vcpui->reply.error = -EINTR;
+ vcpui->waiting_for_reply = true;
+}
+
+static int kvmi_send_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 ev_id,
+ void *ev, size_t ev_size,
+ void *rpl, size_t rpl_size, int *action)
+{
+ struct kvmi_msg_hdr hdr;
+ struct kvmi_event common;
+ struct kvec vec[] = {
+ {.iov_base = &hdr, .iov_len = sizeof(hdr) },
+ {.iov_base = &common, .iov_len = sizeof(common)},
+ {.iov_base = ev, .iov_len = ev_size },
+ };
+ size_t msg_size = sizeof(hdr) + sizeof(common) + ev_size;
+ size_t n = ARRAY_SIZE(vec) - (ev_size == 0 ? 1 : 0);
+ struct kvm_vcpu_introspection *vcpui = VCPUI(vcpu);
+ struct kvm_introspection *kvmi = KVMI(vcpu->kvm);
+ int err;
+
+ kvmi_setup_event_msg_hdr(kvmi, &hdr, msg_size);
+ kvmi_setup_event(vcpu, &common, ev_id);
+ kvmi_setup_vcpu_reply(vcpui, hdr.seq, rpl, rpl_size);
+
+ err = kvmi_sock_write(kvmi, vec, n, msg_size);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+
+ err = kvmi_wait_for_reply(vcpu);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+
+ err = vcpui->reply.error;
+
+ if (!err)
+ *action = vcpui->reply.action;
+
+out:
+ if (err)
+ kvmi_sock_shutdown(kvmi);
+ return err;
+}
+
+u32 kvmi_msg_send_vcpu_pause(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int err, action;
+
+ err = kvmi_send_event(vcpu, KVMI_EVENT_PAUSE_VCPU, NULL, 0,
+ NULL, 0, &action);
+ if (err)
+ return KVMI_EVENT_ACTION_CONTINUE;
+
+ return action;
+}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 21:07 [PATCH v9 00/84] VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:07 ` [PATCH v9 01/84] signal: export kill_pid_info() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-22 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 02/84] KVM: UAPI: add error codes used by the VM introspection code Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 03/84] KVM: add kvm_vcpu_kick_and_wait() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 04/84] KVM: add kvm_get_max_gfn() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 05/84] KVM: doc: fix the hypercall numbering Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 06/84] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_get_regs() and kvm_arch_vcpu_get_sregs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 07/84] KVM: x86: add kvm_arch_vcpu_set_regs() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 08/84] KVM: x86: avoid injecting #PF when emulate the VMCALL instruction Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 09/84] KVM: x86: add .bp_intercepted() to struct kvm_x86_ops Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 10/84] KVM: x86: add .control_cr3_intercept() " Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 11/84] KVM: x86: add .cr3_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 12/84] KVM: x86: add .desc_ctrl_supported() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 13/84] KVM: svm: add support for descriptor-table exits Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 14/84] KVM: x86: add .control_desc_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 15/84] KVM: x86: add .desc_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 16/84] KVM: x86: export .msr_write_intercepted() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 17/84] KVM: x86: use MSR_TYPE_R, MSR_TYPE_W and MSR_TYPE_RW with AMD Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 18/84] KVM: svm: pass struct kvm_vcpu to set_msr_interception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 19/84] KVM: vmx: pass struct kvm_vcpu to the intercept msr related functions Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 20/84] KVM: x86: add .control_msr_intercept() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 21/84] KVM: x86: vmx: use a symbolic constant when checking the exit qualifications Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 22/84] KVM: x86: save the error code during EPT/NPF exits handling Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 23/84] KVM: x86: add .fault_gla() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 24/84] KVM: x86: add .spt_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 25/84] KVM: x86: add .gpt_translation_fault() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 26/84] KVM: x86: add .control_singlestep() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 27/84] KVM: x86: export kvm_arch_vcpu_set_guest_debug() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 28/84] KVM: x86: extend kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_system() with the 'access' parameter Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 29/84] KVM: x86: export kvm_inject_pending_exception() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 30/84] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-22 1:31 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 31/84] KVM: x86: export kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_xsave() Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 32/84] KVM: x86: page track: provide all callbacks with the guest virtual address Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 33/84] KVM: x86: page track: add track_create_slot() callback Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 34/84] KVM: x86: page_track: add support for preread, prewrite and preexec Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 35/84] KVM: x86: wire in the preread/prewrite/preexec page trackers Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 36/84] KVM: x86: disable gpa_available optimization for fetch and page-walk SPT violations Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 37/84] KVM: introduce VM introspection Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 38/84] KVM: introspection: add hook/unhook ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 39/84] KVM: introspection: add permission access ioctls Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 40/84] KVM: introspection: add the read/dispatch message function Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 41/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_GET_VERSION Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 42/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CHECK_COMMAND and KVMI_VM_CHECK_EVENT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 43/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 44/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 45/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 46/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_READ_PHYSICAL/KVMI_VM_WRITE_PHYSICAL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 47/84] KVM: introspection: add vCPU related data Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 48/84] KVM: introspection: add a jobs list to every introspected vCPU Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 49/84] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU introspection requests Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 50/84] KVM: introspection: handle vCPU commands Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 51/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_INFO Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 52/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_PAUSE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` Adalbert Lazăr [this message]
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 54/84] KVM: introspection: add the crash action handling on the event reply Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 55/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 56/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 57/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_REGISTERS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 58/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_CPUID Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 59/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 60/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_BREAKPOINT Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:08 ` [PATCH v9 61/84] KVM: introspection: add cleanup support for vCPUs Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 62/84] KVM: introspection: restore the state of #BP interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 63/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_CLEANUP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 64/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 65/84] KVM: introspection: restore the state of CR3 interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 66/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_INJECT_EXCEPTION + KVMI_EVENT_TRAP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 67/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_GET_MAX_GFN Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 68/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 69/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XCR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-22 8:25 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 70/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 71/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_SET_XSAVE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 72/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_GET_MTRR_TYPE Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 73/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_DESCRIPTOR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 74/84] KVM: introspection: restore the state of descriptor-table register interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 75/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 76/84] KVM: introspection: restore the state of MSR interception on unhook Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 77/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_SET_PAGE_ACCESS Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 78/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_PF Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 79/84] KVM: introspection: extend KVMI_GET_VERSION with struct kvmi_features Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 80/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 81/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 82/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_TRANSLATE_GVA Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 83/84] KVM: introspection: emulate a guest page table walk on SPT violations due to A/D bit updates Adalbert Lazăr
2020-07-21 21:09 ` [PATCH v9 84/84] KVM: x86: call the page tracking code on emulation failure Adalbert Lazăr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200721210922.7646-54-alazar@bitdefender.com \
--to=alazar@bitdefender.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).