virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] virtio-mem: disallow mapping virtio-mem memory via /dev/mem
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:52:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210914075046-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5344ed1-6aaf-9e0a-a32d-f7cf69fe5a34@redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 11:45:25AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 03.09.21 09:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 06:09:19PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > We don't want user space to be able to map virtio-mem device memory
> > > directly (e.g., via /dev/mem) in order to have guarantees that in a sane
> > > setup we'll never accidentially access unplugged memory within the
> > > device-managed region of a virtio-mem device, just as required by the
> > > virtio-spec.
> > > 
> > > As soon as the virtio-mem driver is loaded, the device region is visible
> > > in /proc/iomem via the parent device region. From that point on user space
> > > is aware of the device region and we want to disallow mapping anything
> > > inside that region (where we will dynamically (un)plug memory) until
> > > the driver has been unloaded cleanly and e.g., another driver might take
> > > over.
> > > 
> > > By creating our parent IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM resource with
> > > IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE, we will disallow any /dev/mem access to our
> > > device region until the driver was unloaded cleanly and removed the
> > > parent region. This will work even though only some memory blocks are
> > > actually currently added to Linux and appear as busy in the resource tree.
> > > 
> > > So access to the region from user space is only possible
> > > a) if we don't load the virtio-mem driver.
> > > b) after unloading the virtio-mem driver cleanly.
> > > 
> > > Don't build virtio-mem if access to /dev/mem cannot be restricticted --
> > > if we have CONFIG_DEVMEM=y but CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM is not set.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > 
> > 
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/virtio/Kconfig      | 1 +
> > >   drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 4 +++-
> > >   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > index ce1b3f6ec325..ff80cd03f1d1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/Kconfig
> > > @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ config VIRTIO_MEM
> > >   	depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE
> > >   	depends on MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
> > >   	depends on CONTIG_ALLOC
> > > +	depends on !DEVMEM || STRICT_DEVMEM
> > >   	help
> > >   	 This driver provides access to virtio-mem paravirtualized memory
> > >   	 devices, allowing to hotplug and hotunplug memory.
> > 
> > It would be nicer if there was a symbol in the MEMORY_ namespace
> > we can depend on exported by mm and depending on !DEVMEM ||
> > STRICT_DEVMEM.
> > 
> > E.g.
> > 
> > config MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE
> >          def_bool y
> >          depends on !DEVMEM || STRICT_DEVMEM
> > 
> > and then in virtio
> > 	depends on MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE
> > 
> > 
> 
> Yes, but I'm not able to come up with an expressive name. MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE
> can be highly misleading ...


I mean ... it enables IORESOURCE_EXCLUSIVE ... but ok ...
MEMORY_EXCLUSIVE_KERNEL_MAP ?

> 
> > the virtio change itself is ok though:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> 
> David / dhildenb

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-02 16:09 [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio-mem: disallow mapping virtio-mem memory via /dev/mem David Hildenbrand
2021-09-02 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] kernel/resource: clean up and optimize iomem_is_exclusive() David Hildenbrand
2021-09-02 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] kernel/resource: disallow access to exclusive system RAM regions David Hildenbrand
2021-09-02 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] virtio-mem: disallow mapping virtio-mem memory via /dev/mem David Hildenbrand
2021-09-03  7:02   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-09-14  9:45     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-14 11:52       ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-09-14 11:57         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-09-14 12:04           ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210914075046-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).