From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eperezma@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 8/9] vdpa_sim: replace the spinlock with a mutex to protect the state
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:39:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230324153949.47778-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324153607.46836-1-sgarzare@redhat.com>
The spinlock we use to protect the state of the simulator is sometimes
held for a long time (for example, when devices handle requests).
This also prevents us from calling functions that might sleep (such as
kthread_flush_work() in the next patch), and thus having to release
and retake the lock.
For these reasons, let's replace the spinlock with a mutex that gives
us more flexibility.
Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.h | 4 ++--
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 34 ++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c | 4 ++--
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.h b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.h
index ce83f9130a5d..4774292fba8c 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.h
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.h
@@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ struct vdpasim {
struct kthread_worker *worker;
struct kthread_work work;
struct vdpasim_dev_attr dev_attr;
- /* spinlock to synchronize virtqueue state */
- spinlock_t lock;
+ /* mutex to synchronize virtqueue state */
+ struct mutex mutex;
/* virtio config according to device type */
void *config;
struct vhost_iotlb *iommu;
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
index bd9f9054de94..2b2e439a66f7 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(struct vdpasim_dev_attr *dev_attr,
if (IS_ERR(vdpasim->worker))
goto err_iommu;
- spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_init(&vdpasim->mutex);
spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->iommu_lock);
dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask;
@@ -286,13 +286,13 @@ static void vdpasim_set_vq_ready(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u16 idx, bool ready)
struct vdpasim_virtqueue *vq = &vdpasim->vqs[idx];
bool old_ready;
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
old_ready = vq->ready;
vq->ready = ready;
if (vq->ready && !old_ready) {
vdpasim_queue_ready(vdpasim, idx);
}
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
}
static bool vdpasim_get_vq_ready(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u16 idx)
@@ -310,9 +310,9 @@ static int vdpasim_set_vq_state(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u16 idx,
struct vdpasim_virtqueue *vq = &vdpasim->vqs[idx];
struct vringh *vrh = &vq->vring;
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
vrh->last_avail_idx = state->split.avail_index;
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ static u8 vdpasim_get_status(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
u8 status;
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
status = vdpasim->status;
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
return status;
}
@@ -420,19 +420,19 @@ static void vdpasim_set_status(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u8 status)
{
struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
vdpasim->status = status;
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
}
static int vdpasim_reset(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
{
struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
vdpasim->status = 0;
vdpasim_do_reset(vdpasim);
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -441,9 +441,9 @@ static int vdpasim_suspend(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
{
struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
vdpasim->running = false;
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int vdpasim_resume(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
struct vdpasim *vdpasim = vdpa_to_sim(vdpa);
int i;
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
vdpasim->running = true;
if (vdpasim->pending_kick) {
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static int vdpasim_resume(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
vdpasim->pending_kick = false;
}
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
return 0;
}
@@ -536,14 +536,14 @@ static int vdpasim_set_group_asid(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, unsigned int group,
iommu = &vdpasim->iommu[asid];
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
for (i = 0; i < vdpasim->dev_attr.nvqs; i++)
if (vdpasim_get_vq_group(vdpa, i) == group)
vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[i].vring, iommu,
&vdpasim->iommu_lock);
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c
index eb4897c8541e..568119e1553f 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_blk.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static void vdpasim_blk_work(struct vdpasim *vdpasim)
bool reschedule = false;
int i;
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
if (!(vdpasim->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK))
goto out;
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ static void vdpasim_blk_work(struct vdpasim *vdpasim)
}
}
out:
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
if (reschedule)
vdpasim_schedule_work(vdpasim);
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c
index e61a9ecbfafe..7ab434592bfe 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim_net.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ static void vdpasim_net_work(struct vdpasim *vdpasim)
u64 rx_drops = 0, rx_overruns = 0, rx_errors = 0, tx_errors = 0;
int err;
- spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
if (!vdpasim->running)
goto out;
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static void vdpasim_net_work(struct vdpasim *vdpasim)
}
out:
- spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);
u64_stats_update_begin(&net->tx_stats.syncp);
net->tx_stats.pkts += tx_pkts;
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 15:35 [PATCH v4 0/9] vdpa_sim: add support for user VA Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-24 15:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] vdpa: add bind_mm/unbind_mm callbacks Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-24 15:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] vhost-vdpa: use bind_mm/unbind_mm device callbacks Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-24 15:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] vringh: replace kmap_atomic() with kmap_local_page() Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-24 15:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] vringh: define the stride used for translation Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-24 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] vringh: support VA with iotlb Stefano Garzarella
[not found] ` <ZCWIXZbeWanvPJA3@corigine.com>
2023-03-31 7:45 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-24 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] vdpa_sim: make devices agnostic for work management Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-24 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] vdpa_sim: use kthread worker Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-24 15:39 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2023-03-24 15:40 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] vdpa_sim: add support for user VA Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230324153949.47778-1-sgarzare@redhat.com \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).