* Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket
[not found] ` <99da938b-3e67-150c-2f74-41d917a95950@sberdevices.ru>
@ 2023-03-28 9:39 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-28 9:42 ` Stefano Garzarella
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2023-03-28 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arseniy Krasnov
Cc: Bobby Eshleman, kvm, netdev, linux-kernel, virtualization,
oxffffaa, Eric Dumazet, Stefan Hajnoczi, kernel, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, David S. Miller
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>commit
>c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>but for receive calls.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>
> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and pv-drivers@vmware.com
The other transports seem okay to me.
Thanks,
Stefano
> if (read < 0) {
>- err = -ENOMEM;
>+ err = read;
> break;
> }
>
>@@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>
> if (msg_len < 0) {
>- err = -ENOMEM;
>+ err = msg_len;
> goto out;
> }
>
>--
>2.25.1
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket
2023-03-28 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket Stefano Garzarella
@ 2023-03-28 9:42 ` Stefano Garzarella
[not found] ` <0f0a8603-e8a1-5fb2-23d9-5773c808ef85@sberdevices.ru>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2023-03-28 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arseniy Krasnov, Bryan Tan, Vishnu Dasa, VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers
Cc: Bobby Eshleman, kvm, netdev, linux-kernel, virtualization,
oxffffaa, Eric Dumazet, Stefan Hajnoczi, kernel, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, David S. Miller
I pressed send too early...
CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and pv-drivers@vmware.com
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> >This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
> >was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
> >commit
> >c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
> >but for receive calls.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
> >---
> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
> >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> >@@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> >
> > read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>
> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>
> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
>
> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and pv-drivers@vmware.com
>
> The other transports seem okay to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
> > if (read < 0) {
> >- err = -ENOMEM;
> >+ err = read;
> > break;
> > }
> >
> >@@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> > msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
> >
> > if (msg_len < 0) {
> >- err = -ENOMEM;
> >+ err = msg_len;
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> >--
> >2.25.1
> >
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] vsock/test: update expected return values
[not found] ` <f302d3de-28aa-e0b1-1fed-88d3c3bd606a@sberdevices.ru>
@ 2023-03-28 9:44 ` Stefano Garzarella
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2023-03-28 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arseniy Krasnov
Cc: Bobby Eshleman, kvm, netdev, linux-kernel, virtualization,
oxffffaa, Eric Dumazet, Stefan Hajnoczi, kernel, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, David S. Miller
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:14:01AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>This updates expected return values for invalid buffer test. Now such
>values are returned from transport, not from af_vsock.c.
Since only virtio transport supports it for now, it's okay.
In the future we should make sure that we have the same behavior between
transports.
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>---
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>index 3de10dbb50f5..a91d0ef963be 100644
>--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
>@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static void test_seqpacket_invalid_rec_buffer_server(const struct test_opts *opt
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
>
>- if (errno != ENOMEM) {
>+ if (errno != EFAULT) {
> perror("unexpected errno of 'broken_buf'");
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
>@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void test_inv_buf_client(const struct test_opts *opts, bool stream)
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
>
>- if (errno != ENOMEM) {
>+ if (errno != EFAULT) {
> fprintf(stderr, "unexpected recv(2) errno %d\n", errno);
> exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> }
>--
>2.25.1
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket
[not found] ` <0f0a8603-e8a1-5fb2-23d9-5773c808ef85@sberdevices.ru>
@ 2023-03-28 11:19 ` Stefano Garzarella
[not found] ` <64451c35-5442-73cb-4398-2b907dd810cc@sberdevices.ru>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Garzarella @ 2023-03-28 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arseniy Krasnov, Vishnu Dasa
Cc: Bobby Eshleman, kvm, VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers, netdev,
linux-kernel, virtualization, oxffffaa, Bryan Tan, Eric Dumazet,
Stefan Hajnoczi, kernel, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
David S. Miller
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:42:19PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
>On 28.03.2023 12:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> I pressed send too early...
>>
>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and pv-drivers@vmware.com
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>> This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>>>> was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>>>> commit
>>>> c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>>>> but for receive calls.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>>>> ---
>>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>> index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>
>>>> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>>>
>>> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
>>> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>>>
>>> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
>>> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
>
>Yes, seems i missed it, because several months ago we had similar question for send
>logic:
>https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4611091.html
>And it was ok to not handle VMCI send path in this way. So i think current implementation
>for tx is a little bit buggy, because VMCI specific error from 'vmci_qpair_enquev()' is
>returned to af_vsock.c. I think error conversion must be added to VMCI transport for tx
>also.
Good point!
These are negative values, so there are no big problems, but I don't
know what the user expects in this case.
@Vishnu Do we want to return an errno to the user or a VMCI_ERROR_*?
In both cases I think we should do the same for both enqueue and
dequeue.
>
>Good thing is that Hyper-V uses general error codes.
Yeah!
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>Thanks, Arseniy
>>>
>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and pv-drivers@vmware.com
>>>
>>> The other transports seem okay to me.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>>> if (read < 0) {
>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>> + err = read;
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>>>>
>>>> if (msg_len < 0) {
>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>> + err = msg_len;
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket
[not found] ` <64451c35-5442-73cb-4398-2b907dd810cc@sberdevices.ru>
@ 2023-03-29 21:44 ` Vishnu Dasa via Virtualization
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vishnu Dasa via Virtualization @ 2023-03-29 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arseniy Krasnov, Stefano Garzarella
Cc: Bobby Eshleman, kvm, Pv-drivers, netdev, LKML,
Linux Virtualization, Krasnov Arseniy, Bryan Tan, Eric Dumazet,
Stefan Hajnoczi, kernel, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
David S. Miller
> On Mar 28, 2023, at 4:20 AM, Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru> wrote:
>
> !! External Email
>
> On 28.03.2023 14:19, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:42:19PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28.03.2023 12:42, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>>> I pressed send too early...
>>>>
>>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and pv-drivers@vmware.com
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 11:39 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:13:11AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>>>>> This removes behaviour, where error code returned from any transport
>>>>>> was always switched to ENOMEM. This works in the same way as:
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>> c43170b7e157 ("vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket"),
>>>>>> but for receive calls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 4 ++--
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>> index 19aea7cba26e..9262e0b77d47 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>>>>>> @@ -2007,7 +2007,7 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> read = transport->stream_dequeue(vsk, msg, len - copied, flags);
>>>>>
>>>>> In vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() vmci_qpair_peekv() and
>>>>> vmci_qpair_dequev() return VMCI_ERROR_* in case of errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should return -ENOMEM in vmci_transport_stream_dequeue() if
>>>>> those functions fail to keep the same behavior.
>>>
>>> Yes, seems i missed it, because several months ago we had similar question for send
>>> logic:
>>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spinics.net%2Flists%2Fkernel%2Fmsg4611091.html&data=05%7C01%7Cvdasa%40vmware.com%7C3b17793425384debe75708db2f7eec8c%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C638155994413494900%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MMfFcKuFFvMcJrbToKvWvIB%2FZmzp%2BdGGVWFVWztuSzg%3D&reserved=0
>>> And it was ok to not handle VMCI send path in this way. So i think current implementation
>>> for tx is a little bit buggy, because VMCI specific error from 'vmci_qpair_enquev()' is
>>> returned to af_vsock.c. I think error conversion must be added to VMCI transport for tx
>>> also.
>>
>> Good point!
>>
>> These are negative values, so there are no big problems, but I don't
>> know what the user expects in this case.
>>
>> @Vishnu Do we want to return an errno to the user or a VMCI_ERROR_*?
>
> Small remark, as i can see, VMCI_ERROR_ is not exported to user in include/uapi,
> so IIUC user won't be able to interpret such values correctly.
>
> Thanks, Arseniy
Let's just return -ENOMEM from vmci transport in case of error in
vmci_transport_stream_enqueue and vmci_transport_stream_dequeue.
@Arseniy,
Could you please add a separate patch in this set to handle the above?
Thanks,
Vishnu
>
>>
>> In both cases I think we should do the same for both enqueue and
>> dequeue.
>>
>>>
>>> Good thing is that Hyper-V uses general error codes.
>>
>> Yeah!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Arseniy
>>>>>
>>>>> CCing Bryan, Vishnu, and pv-drivers@vmware.com
>>>>>
>>>>> The other transports seem okay to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Stefano
>>>>>
>>>>>> if (read < 0) {
>>>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>>> + err = read;
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -2058,7 +2058,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>>>>>> msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (msg_len < 0) {
>>>>>> - err = -ENOMEM;
>>>>>> + err = msg_len;
>>>>>> goto out;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> !! External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-29 21:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <97f19214-ba04-c47e-7486-72e8aa16c690@sberdevices.ru>
[not found] ` <99da938b-3e67-150c-2f74-41d917a95950@sberdevices.ru>
2023-03-28 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: return errors other than -ENOMEM to socket Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-28 9:42 ` Stefano Garzarella
[not found] ` <0f0a8603-e8a1-5fb2-23d9-5773c808ef85@sberdevices.ru>
2023-03-28 11:19 ` Stefano Garzarella
[not found] ` <64451c35-5442-73cb-4398-2b907dd810cc@sberdevices.ru>
2023-03-29 21:44 ` Vishnu Dasa via Virtualization
[not found] ` <f302d3de-28aa-e0b1-1fed-88d3c3bd606a@sberdevices.ru>
2023-03-28 9:44 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] vsock/test: update expected return values Stefano Garzarella
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).