Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-blk: support per-device queue depth

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On 2021/1/20 上午9:51, JeffleXu wrote:
>
> On 1/19/21 12:06 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2021/1/19 上午9:33, JeffleXu wrote:
>>> On 1/18/21 1:25 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> On 2021/1/18 上午11:58, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>>>> module parameter 'virtblk_queue_depth' was firstly introduced for
>>>>> testing/benchmarking purposes described in commit fc4324b4597c
>>>>> ("virtio-blk: base queue-depth on virtqueue ringsize or module param").
>>>>> Since we have different virtio-blk devices which have different
>>>>> capabilities, it requires that we support per-device queue depth
>>>>> instead
>>>>> of per-module. So defaultly use vq free elements if module parameter
>>>>> 'virtblk_queue_depth' is not set.
>>>> I wonder if it's better to use sysfs instead (or whether it has already
>>>> had something like this in the blocker layer).
>>>>
>>> "/sys/block/<dev>/queue/nr_requests" indeed works, but isn't better to
>>> set queue_depth according to the hardware capability at the very first?
>>> AFAIK, nvme just set per-device queue_depth at initializing phase.
>>
>> I agree, the problem is that the current code may modify module parameter.
> The module parameter 'virtblk_queue_depth' is actually remained untainted.
>
> Actually it is the original code before this patch that changes the
> module parameter.


Yes, that's what I meant.


> When the module parameter is not set by boot cmdline
> (i.e., default to 0), it will be initialized to the queue_depth of the
> vring of the first probed virtio-blk device, and will be revealed to
> user space through '/sys/module/virtio_blk/parameters/queue_depth'. I'm
> not sure if this behavior is reasonable or not.


Right, it means the virtio-blk devices that is probed after the first 
one can only use the queue_depth that is set according to the capability 
of the first virtio-blk device.


>
> The only side effect of this patch is that, now
> '/sys/module/virtio_blk/parameters/queue_depth' will be kept as '0' when
> the module parameter is not set manually.


I think it's not an issue, the nr_request should be the correct way to  
get per device queue depth.

Thanks


>
>
> Thanks,
> Jeffle
>
>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>>>>     1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>>>>> index 145606d..f83a417 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
>>>>> @@ -705,6 +705,7 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
>>>>> *vdev)
>>>>>         u32 v, blk_size, max_size, sg_elems, opt_io_size;
>>>>>         u16 min_io_size;
>>>>>         u8 physical_block_exp, alignment_offset;
>>>>> +    unsigned int queue_depth;
>>>>>           if (!vdev->config->get) {
>>>>>             dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config access disabled\n",
>>>>> @@ -755,17 +756,18 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device
>>>>> *vdev)
>>>>>             goto out_free_vq;
>>>>>         }
>>>>>     -    /* Default queue sizing is to fill the ring. */
>>>>> -    if (!virtblk_queue_depth) {
>>>>> -        virtblk_queue_depth = vblk->vqs[0].vq->num_free;
>>>>> +    if (likely(!virtblk_queue_depth)) {
>>>>> +        queue_depth = vblk->vqs[0].vq->num_free;
>>>>>             /* ... but without indirect descs, we use 2 descs per req */
>>>>>             if (!virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC))
>>>>> -            virtblk_queue_depth /= 2;
>>>>> +            queue_depth /= 2;
>>>>> +    } else {
>>>>> +        queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth;
>>>>>         }
>>>>>           memset(&vblk->tag_set, 0, sizeof(vblk->tag_set));
>>>>>         vblk->tag_set.ops = &virtio_mq_ops;
>>>>> -    vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = virtblk_queue_depth;
>>>>> +    vblk->tag_set.queue_depth = queue_depth;
>>>>>         vblk->tag_set.numa_node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
>>>>>         vblk->tag_set.flags = BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE;
>>>>>         vblk->tag_set.cmd_size =

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization