From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: logcabin@fastmail.net Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 75e75457 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 2efb8c24 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B57F21BFD for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2018 16:53:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1531169636.4058203.1435157760.0BBF41F5@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: logcabin@fastmail.net To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 16:53:56 -0400 Subject: Re: Poor performance under high load List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I'm getting 95 Mbps download speed with 0.0.20180708, and this with ARM v7l. On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hey Max, > > Try out 0.0.20180708. I suspect it might show a bit better curve. > > Jason > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com > https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard